Can someone explain how negating helps us to determine if the answer choice is correct or not? I just don't understand how to do it...

#Help is the main way to know the difference between conditional logic and causal logic the indicator words? And do ONLY MBT questions feature causal logic?

Wow that answer helped me tremendously! Thank you :)

#help I did not choose answer D because of the word "charges" that was used in the answer versus the word "convicted" that was used in the context of the passage. Why is it wrong to not highlight this distinction when choosing my answer?

#feedback would this be the Lawgic form of those arguments?

B ‑m→ R

B ‑m→ N2+

R ←s→ N2+

M ‑m→ CC

M ‑m→ /GF

CC ←s→ /GF

#feedback Can someone explain #3? The "only" part indicates that we would follow Group 2, and the "No" and "unless" parts indicate that we would follow Group 4 and Group 3. Thus,

written --> survive

/truth --> /written (with the contrapositive being: written --> truth)

It would end up being like #4. These can't be connected into a chain, since "written" is the sufficient condition of both statements.