@benjaminladdbryce894

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=236930&start=125

There you go!

I had 2 LGs for today's test and I thought the second one was slightly easier, although I ran out of time on the last couple questions on both. @gplizard101121 (or others) - so the 2nd game is the real one? How do you know?

"I got this question right not because anything clicked and I figured out what the hell's going on"

LMFAOOO

BTW Love the vids of JY doing questions under timed conditions!

(B) is wrong because justification IS provided in the previous part of that sentence AND in the previous sentence.

Yeah, I don't get this question either. I chose (D) because:

Premise: If you avoid dairy, you'll be more likely to avoid fat in your diet, and you'll be more likely to avoid heart disease.

Conclusion: If you avoid dairy, you'll be more likely to have good health.

The premise talks about avoiding heart disease, but the conclusion is about maintaining good health. (D) perfectly captures this. What's wrong here?

"The writing styles in works of high literary quality are not well suited to the avoidance of misinterpretation." Haha, wow, what a convoluted way of saying that the writing styles are often misinterpreted!

That makes sense. Thanks so much!

I don't quite get it.

I'm confused about why (E) is wrong. Dana would say no for (E) because she says that a child's accustomed style of learning should ALWAYS dictate what method is used. Pat would say yes for (E) because he thinks that tailoring is sometimes good and sometimes bad (as a child needs to do both group and individual learning).

Isn't this disagreement?

Got ya. I think I understand -- I still think the phrasing could have been a little less ambiguous. But I understand now. Thanks for the clarification!

(E) just says that out of the two webs, the one with UV attracted the majority of the flies. It still doesn't strengthen in any way the argument, which says that certain PATTERNS of UV in the web attract insects. Can anyone please explain?

Choice E was sort of difficult to understand because of a subtle phrasing issue it had. E refers to workers "who are aware that they will soon be laid off from a job", yet doesn't clarify that the factory workers WERE actually aware that the factory would close. But then again this is from December 1997, so it could be that older questions are just more ambiguously phrased, right J.Y.?