Hello 7sagers,
I've been trying to make sense of this question for the longest time but I just can't seem to understand what the difference between answer choice (c) and (e) is.
Here's my train of thought.
We all know from the core curriculum that A unless B is
~A~ ---> B
OR
~B~ --> A
Given this, (c) states "Unless K is assigned to T, both F and M must be assigned to T."
(e) states, "Unless either H or M is assigned to T, K must be assigned to T."
So to put (c) into lawgic and if I put it in ~A~ --> B form, it reads, ~Ft and Mt~ --> Kt. If I were to do the contrapositive, it reads, ~Kt~ --> Ft or Mt.
Is this contrapositive right? The answer says that it's supposed to be contraposed back into ~Kt~ --> Ft and Mt but I seriously cannot understand why that would become an "and" statement...
But if I were to put it in the ~B~ --> A form, it reads, ~Kt~ --> Ft and Mt (which is the correct answer). I'm really confused as to why these two are coming out differently when it shouldn't be...
Please help! I feel like I'm not understanding the most basic concept of lawgic and it's truly giving me so much anxiety.
Admin note: edited title
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-74-section-2-game-4
@ Dang! Her reading list is amazing...thank you so much for sharing with me! :blush: