@ I was responding to your original post that referred to a "theory". In no part in that post where you trying to "gathering evidence" to file a complaint.(which is a privacy issue in itself) What you were trying to do is gather evidence so the "theory" won't be a theory anymore. I suggest you adjust yourself to take the exam with 5 sections rather than spend precious time you could be studying figuring out how to fight against one of the most annoying and stressful organizations like the LSAC. My word may mean nothing to you and something to others in this community that should believe each other, treat each other with respect and decency.
You may be entitled to take the experimental section even if you receive accommodations. This is the case for me on the upcoming test. & No, I will not provide you with any screenshot or quote's from my communications with lsat. If its not to much to ask, you have to take some people's word for granted as I don't see no gain for me in lying or distorting the truth of the matter.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/begging-the-question check this out guys, I think it's accurate.
Isn't it a "begging the question" flaw because it's begging the question "do other options exist?"
Because he is right and because he is correct. He is right or correct.
It was supposed to help show that it is in fact circular reasoning because it's literally restating the premises except it's including both into the conclusion rather than individually.
This diagram of the flaw may be helpful:
I ---> not PC
I ----> not PL
Conc I ----> not PC or PL
Hi y'all, I'm studying for the upcoming Dec LSAT and am currently scoring in the low 160's. I'm interested in working with someone(s) to do PT'S/BR/Drill etc. Shoot my inbox and let's set something up to crush the LSAT. It's almost time!
I can confirm that the moose/wolf LR section was real. So was the bone instrument LR questions
Hey anyone that did the virus game I got a question about it if you can please pm me