The Disney argument is the strongest simply because there is no room for interpretation. Once one is a DVC member they can access the Genie+ pass through only two mechanisms, Walt has the pass and has NOT gone through the second meaning that he must have gone through the first.

The Tiger Argument is weaker because an animal's aggressive nature and ability to injure a person are not mentioned as EXPLICITLY linked to an animal's suitability as a pet (although one could argue that in reality they are linked). ie. one could imagine Pitbulls to be described as having both of those characteristics yet they make great pets for many.

The third is the weakest in my mind because the evidence is simply sufficient, it shows that it is possible that the cat is guilty but nothing more.

I'm interested, shoot me a message.