Self-study
What are your strategies for fool proofing LG with the digital test? Do you still print the "bundle"/PT 1-35?
PT Questions
irenerodriguez929
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
irenerodriguez929
Saturday, Jun 01 2019
I have the same problem with overthinking. But, I think if we need to add assumptions to validate that an answer choice is in fact correct, then we have a problem and that AC is not a contender. That's what happened with me when I got stuck on B. I originally chose C then switched to B and convinced myself it was right as I kept adding assumptions on how it can strengthen and added scenarios on how C can in fact weaken...
irenerodriguez929
Thursday, May 30 2019
tough question, especially under timed conditions! AC (A) almost seems like an NA answer (when negated). Not sure if this approach (similar to NA) would help me identify the correct AC in a strengthen question?
irenerodriguez929
Monday, May 27 2019
Hi! I'm interested in the BR groups. I'm registered for the July test. Do you have a schedule for which pts you'll be reviewing until game day?
irenerodriguez929
Saturday, May 11 2019
Nice analogy! I see what you mean, though. I guess I just lucked out on this one. When I read C, I took it as a subtle paraphrase on when the chess playing programs have a better chance of winning.
irenerodriguez929
Friday, May 10 2019
I thought to approach MSS questions we are looking for very broad answer choice or paraphrase of the stimulus?
irenerodriguez929
Tuesday, Aug 01 2017
Originally went for D, but thought we should not make any assumptions in regards to the environmental pollution and using that as an alternative cause. So I ended up choosing C, thinking it was contradicting the relationship between "lower average fat intake, the lower the incidence of cancer." Now I see the similarity between the premise and answer choice C, however, I am confused when we can make assumptions for the correct answer choice?
irenerodriguez929
Tuesday, Aug 01 2017
I had the same thought process! However, I am constantly reminding myself that we can not make any assumptions and just go with what is given (at least for these question types).
BUT C supports the argument since one of the premises mentions that our ability to find tornadoes has improved and that is why more have been reported. So C suggests we now have better technology to find these small tornadoes and it isn't the case that the number of tornadoes doubled since 1950.