User Avatar
ishanc0319910
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free

I'm confused about which two candidates specifically don't contribute to the overall goal of the proposal.

(1) Interfere with mosquito ability to find mates

(2) Cause destruction of disease parasite before stage where it can be transmitted

(3) Disable mechanism of mosquito's own resistance to disease

Goal: Introduce mosquitos with genetic alterations that destroy disease-carrying capacity.

Is it (1) and (3), based on the assumption that the primary goal revolves around "carrying," specifically?

Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."

PrepTests ·
PT154.S1.Q26
User Avatar
ishanc0319910
Tuesday, Nov 07 2023

#help: When I was writing out the conditional logic for this one, I understood content post "only if" to be on the left side of the arrow, not the right as done here. Thus, I wrote:

perf not moral wrong --> alt action gen open --> action perf freely --> morally resp

Whereas the explanation states:

morally resp --> action perf freely --> alt action gen open --> perf not moral wrong

I hypothesize that if "only if" is included, flip my logic. If "if" is included, my logic is correct.

Am I correct in this hypothesis? I'm essentially trying to understand how to draw out conditional logic for "only if" vs. "if."

Confirm action

Are you sure?