Hey guys, I read the whole chapter and understood up to competing hypothesis but what is the point of knowing all these experiment factors? (ideal experiment, placebo, blinding)
I understand the sample representation because some LR questions deal with samples but why do we need to know ideal experiments, placebo, and blinding? Are they necessary so we can run an ideal experiment in our head on LSAT? Please share your opinions.
4
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
Hey guys, I read the whole chapter and understood up to competing hypothesis but what is the point of knowing all these experiment factors? (ideal experiment, placebo, blinding)
I understand the sample representation because some LR questions deal with samples but why do we need to know ideal experiments, placebo, and blinding? Are they necessary so we can run an ideal experiment in our head on LSAT? Please share your opinions.