Subscription pricing
For example,
PT 43 S2 Q10
I am trying to examine the stimulus with only logic and try to make sense of AC A.
Acceptance of criticism requires positive response.
A -> PS
Students are more likely to learn from criticism that they are more likely to respond positively. (I paraphrased it)
More likely PS --> More likely to L
SO, can I infer from the above that students are more likely to accept criticism only when students are more likely to respond positively?
More likely A --> More likely PS
becasue
A-->More likely A. One will accept that one criticism only when one is likely to accept that one criticism.
Assuming that one is logical and not some kind of robot programed with random allgorithem.
The same goes with PS. PS --> More likely PS. One will respond positively to the criticism only when one is likely to respond positively to the criticism.
If we chain up the inferrences, we get
A-->More likely A --> PS--> More likely PS--> More likely to L.
And because of the inferrences made above, we can say that one is more likely to learn from criticism when they are more likely to accept the criticism.
A) Students are more likely to learn from crticism that they accept than from crticism they do not accept.
Paraphrase: If one accept a criticism, then one is more likely to learn from it.
A--> More likely to L
if we negate this, then A--> NOT more likely to L. It will contradict with our argument. Therefore, this assumption is necessary.
Another NA I can think of is A->L. When one accept the criticism, one will learn from the criticism.
Please correct me because I am 80% not confident with what I wrote here.
Thanks for the laugh! Really need this after getting a 1/5 in one of the LR drills. lol