old question but thats what I thought too

For the few clause, doesn't some are, most are not also allow for it to be kitten ←s→ home-children? Since in the lesson it says that few can be interpreted as some or most. I feel like this question could be best answered with most however some still feels like an acceptable answer to me. Is there anything that disproves that?

I don't understand the point of this lesson. Why use the same example as the previous page if it's not supposed to be related? It seems like it only does so to make this strategy seem useful, because without inferring the rule from the other page to be true here, we would have no reason to assume those requirements to be the rule in this example.