I don't understand the point of this lesson. Why use the same example as the previous page if it's not supposed to be related? It seems like it only does so to make this strategy seem useful, because without inferring the rule from the other page to be true here, we would have no reason to assume those requirements to be the rule in this example.
9
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
I don't understand the point of this lesson. Why use the same example as the previous page if it's not supposed to be related? It seems like it only does so to make this strategy seem useful, because without inferring the rule from the other page to be true here, we would have no reason to assume those requirements to be the rule in this example.