@zaq3584 same, which ultimately leads me to feel like I very narrowly avoided trouble with this one and, in another world, may have fallen for a wrong answer. Not a good feeling -- I don't wanna think I'm gonna mess up suff and nec on test day :(

I knew that C functioned adequately as a contrapositive. This made me feel confident enough to pick it. But I only ruled out B because I felt that Mary did not make sure her information was accurate or complete, seeing as most of it came from the NEGATIVE reports of SOME of his supervisors/coworkers (not complete, not wholly representative, potentially inaccurate). Knowing that that was how I made my decision, I wonder if I would've fallen for its trap and chosen it had it said she bugged his Meta glasses on his first day at work and then mulled over a complete audiovisual archive of every single move he ever made on the job before reaching her conclusion. Would I have realized that this was only fulfilling a nec condition? I hope so!

@shellsea my understanding, as someone who got it wrong, is professional behavior does not = whatever it is that the "professionals in this sport" are doing. false equivocation.

Hello! I think I'm in a similar boat.

@sunday9t9t677 this is precisely the mistake that I made. While I ended up going with B, in the context of this being a "most strongly supported" question, B invokes ideas that are simply not present in the text.

What does this mean? It means I have forgotten how to read.

GOLLY GEE I LOVE ME SOME DOUBLE NEGATIVES I TRULY TRULY DO

Don't think it's a feature yet but I may have invented a workaround: any question you flag is automatically rendered "recommended for BR," so just flag every question and boom, now they're all recommended for BR.