Can someone explain why E is wrong? What if the population had been declining continuously for the past 100 years, even before the ozone depletion occurred? Who cares if it's been declining continuously over the past 50 years? What if for some of those years, it was the ozone, and other years it was, I don't know, a fatal virus?

#help (Added by Admin)

This is a GREAT practice question for rejecting the four wrong answers and moving on. AC A, C, D and E have nothing to do with the argument. Even though it's tough to understand B, you have to choose it and move on.

I disagree with this explanation. On rough waters, a cabin with no windows can still be affected (items on the all could move, for example). In this way, both the inner ears and eyes would tell you that you are moving.

Chose E. Didn't read B close enough. Ugh!

C is a total trap answer. I read over D too quickly, and missed the part about diatom death.

Wow I totally misread this question.

Im proud I chose D with confidence, even though it didn't describe the flaw.

Had D but then picked C in blind review. Ugh!

I disagree with JY here. I think the administrator is reinterpreting "new diagnostic technologies." Suffering stays consistent in both. Yet the administrator reinterprets new diagnostic technologies to be something that will minimize patient suffering, where the auditor did not.

This was such a hard question. Read too fast, definitely found it hard to pin down the difference between A and D on a quick read.

This was a tough question. I initially put A, but then thought it was a trick question and put B. I also thought the seeds could be germinated the next morning. Guess the lesson here is to not overthink the wording.

I had trouble with "extra eggs." I did not necessarily contribute extra eggs to parasitic behavior.

Can't thank you enough. What a ride it has been. 70 days later and here I am.

I misread AC D). For that answer to be correct, it should have read "Some drivers whose blood alcohol content is between 0.4 and 0.8 pose a (substantial) danger to the public."

This is the first question so far that I simply do not understand.

This hurts my head.

Ugh! Forgot statement that he works 5 days!

I did this question a bit differently.

Premise: Anybody who manages to convince some people of his or her qualifications is an expert. (MCQ → E)

Conclusion: Almost anyone can be an expert. (P ‑m→ E)

MCQ → E

------------------------

P ‑m→ E

Answer choice A: P ‑m→ MCQ

That's perfect.

P ‑m→ MCQ → E

P ‑m→ E

Very tough question. My big mistake was to gloss over the second part of the conclusion, "and can even pass their concerns on to other crows." Became huge time sink looking for answer (which didn't exist) that satisfied only the first part of the conclusion.

Had no idea what AC C) meant, so I just chose D). :/