#help could someone address this question please?

@Oleynik literealy same. Also misspelled literally

@Katie_Volpert I'm still a little confused on this. I wrote it the same way you initially did, that econ weak → price constant + unemployment rise. If investment decreases → unemployment rises. But there's still a different necessary condition (price constant) that could fail. So I'm still confused on why it was ok to ignore that part

I read A as half-truths and mosquitos and thought "I mean...I guess that would make for bad sound quality???" Then reread it and understood the actual sentence 😅

Even if they can replace the seeds, they can't replace the season. I felt like the answer was likely B, but didn't choose it for the sheer ridiculousness of its proposal

Throwing "physiological" and "psychological" in the same question is dirty work