Biggest thing I noticed between these two was necessary is a requirement for the argument to stand/be valid, sufficient is for the argument to make sense/be stronger.
For question 5, I just didn't read the question stem correctly, I was thinking it was saying that if encryption was a thing, how would the author feel? I saw the "single key stroke". but I'm not sure I guess I just bundled it with encryption and didn't think it was proposing a new encryption method that was easy. I see this now, but I hate when my brain just doesn't correctly processes these questions because it totally changes the question if you don't know what is being asked.
Idk if it was just me, but until I watched the review video just now, I read ac C as "casual" not "causal"... BRUH
This one tripped me up as well, but for different reasons than I am reading in the comments. For me, I was thinking if the group was able to continue operation for this year AND announce operation for next year, than instead of being in this unknowing spot every year, they know they have at least 2 years of sponsors, leading me to believe that potentially they had more money. I originally picked A and in the blind review, I thought about it this way and clearly a little too hard and picked C, thinking they must have had an increase in budget if they now know they have 2 years of operation ahead and funded, instead of just one, as like their dilemma in the first place.
I had this correct and changed it on the blind review :(
SO annoying when I was between the right answer and one of the wrong ones and I gaslit myself into not picking it....
Its the wording that gets me sometimes. In the conclusion, I read it as an additional 25% of the films are based on books, plus the already known portion of 25% of films based on novels. ... watching this explanation video I feel dumb lol hate when this happens!
I am pretty lost on why the correct answer is D. There is nothing in the stimulus that specifics that the Shoe Factory only hires citizens of Centerville. I would love to get some feed back on how other people did this question. I got answer B....
This is some sneaky snake activity if I ever saw it... sneaky sneaky LSAT writers.
Ok I understand why the answer I marked, C was incorrect, specifically because of the last part of the sentence says "some clearly never were". However, the correct answer choice, option D also confuses me because it says that small amounts of the Co2 entered the soil from the atmosphere. The confusing part in all this is that the premise says the plants make the Co2 and put it into the atmosphere, so I do not understand completely why option D is correct. I understand why my answer of option C was incorrect, however.
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."
I got caught up choosing D. I realize now it just says she has promising literature and does not compare it to "today's literature" ... compared to what she had before. UGH. That tripped me up on the first run and the blind review. :(.
I first picked D. I need to watch this video to understand why. When the words get all technical, it makes it harder for me to pick the right MSS.
I did not even realize you had podcasts! This is awesome. My new daily walk tunes haha.
I find myself getting a little overwhelmed with the study methods and how to logically reason myself to understand the correct answers before they are explained. My first practice test did not go well and left me a bit discouraged. Does anyone have some advice on ways I can help prep myself a little better.
First celeb I thought of was Kayne not gonna lie