I think for the 70s so far there seems to be a limited trend of reintroducing older game types. I'd say if you have time, brush up on older, perhaps unfamiliar game types.

More precisely, is it really as simple as seeing where the "so" is located and recognizing that it often introduces the conclusion?

On BR I eventually did figure out which of the three conditional statements was the conclusion. But only because of an intuitive sense and only after looking at the question for 10+ minutes. I guess my question is regarding identifying the conclusion, how you did it so quickly and what tipped you off as to its location in the stimulus?

Thanks

Jonathan, thank you for this post! This has to be some of the best advice that I have ever received regarding LSAT studying. Being complacent and uncritical of your own work can only lead to mediocrity and acceptance of a result far below your true capability.

to confirm, PT 63?