I'm having a lot of difficulty understanding why B is the correct answer here. After watching the explanation I see why the other answers are incorrect, but I really want to understand why B is wholly correct...hopefully that makes sense. I see that Dana would disagree with B. She thinks that the learning a child is accustomed to should ALWAYS dictate teaching methods. Thus, a child should not learn (or at least all children should not learn) to adapt.
I fail to see why Pat would necessarily agree with B, given the text itself. Pat only say that it is not ALWAYS the case that accustomed styles of learning should dictate what method is used (maybe sometimes that is the case though...). He would agree that it is NOT wrong (it is correct) to think that that the same educational methods should be used with all children. Why does this necessarily mean he would agree that ALL children should learn to adapt to various educational methods? Couldnt there be some children that can't learn under certain methods, such as group learning. He doesnt have any universal statements in his disagreement...he just disagrees with Dana's universal statement.
Also, if anyone has tips on point of issue questions such as this it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks so much in advance!
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-32-section-4-question-20/
One thought I have regarding another reason why C is wrong:
The negation of the real estate slump has been with us for a long time is NOT that the real estate market is healthy. Rather, it's that the slump was not with us for a long time. It could be the case that the real estate market is healthy in this moment AND the slump was there for sometime...so even if you were to buy the reasoning in C, it doesn't do enough to negate the condition.
Does this make sense to anyone? I'd like to hear feedback on this point....
#help