Can I get a half a point for the second best answer s'il vous plaît?

Made the mistake of making "Fortunately, investment is not decreasing" as the conclusion.

1/6 on MBF problem set 2 and this was the only one I got right and actually 22 seconds faster than target time. There's hope!

I don't think this is right.

I got the answer right but my diagram looked like

B←s→P→/U18→LV

I told myself if AC A is right I'll be pissed. Don't understand how this is a must be true question. We can infer that A could be the case, but i'm having trouble seeing how it must be the case.

None of these questions have to make sense, they just have to logically follow or in others words be valid. We aren't judging the soundness of the argument in SA.

I would say trying to diagram this is pretty difficult and is probably why I & some others got it wrong.

I confused myself because wrote I for imperfect when I should've put it as /I.

Same. I looked up rebate during BR and only then did I knew what being said.

The "If valid" helps. Which of the following "if true/valid", most strongly supports the... tells you is not an MSS question.

Not that it really matters, but I think you are in the reverse splitters category since your GPA is high and LSAT is average. This is just my personal opinion, but if your ambitions are to go to a T14 law school or top law school - That high GPA may masquerade your average LSAT score if you graduated from a top school or a majored in something that is known to be difficult. But, the LSAT score is still the most important piece of the application. Also "average" is a tricky word, because I heard people calling themselves splitters/reverse splitters and they have 3.5/172 or 3.8/166 LSAT scores. From the college admission conversations that I've been apart of those folks are considered in the great scores side more than "splitters" side.

I know this is 3 months old, but still want to reply for those who may have the same confusion. Words like Only, Only If, Only Where... are necessary word indicators that tell you what comes after is the necessary condition and not the sufficient condition.

so for example: if you are a superior champion, then you have mastery techniques.

That is the same as: Only if you have mastery techniques, then you are a superior champion.

But is not the same as A: Only if you are a champion, then you have a superior mastery of technique.

It is wrong because it puts Champion in the necessary condition and not sufficient.

Another simpler way of thinking of it is

If A happens then B will happen.

So whenever A happens B happens

But that is not the same as if B happens then A will happen

B can happen without A, but A cannot activate/happen without not activating B.

Congrats on your achievements. I am surprised with your philosophy background LG is your biggest struggle. I was a Phil student in college and LG is very similar to the logic classes I took. I would even go a step further and say it's easier. Also, I think 7 sage is best in helping with LG - better than any book that I've used. Also, I think it is accurate to state that if you were to get everything wrong in LG and get everything right in every other section, you'll have around a 158 score.

Same

interested