I confused myself because wrote I for imperfect when I should've put it as /I.

Congrats on your achievements. I am surprised with your philosophy background LG is your biggest struggle. I was a Phil student in college and LG is very similar to the logic classes I took. I would even go a step further and say it's easier. Also, I think 7 sage is best in helping with LG - better than any book that I've used. Also, I think it is accurate to state that if you were to get everything wrong in LG and get everything right in every other section, you'll have around a 158 score.

interested

Can I get a half a point for the second best answer s'il vous plaît?

Made the mistake of making "Fortunately, investment is not decreasing" as the conclusion.

1/6 on MBF problem set 2 and this was the only one I got right and actually 22 seconds faster than target time. There's hope!

I got the answer right but my diagram looked like

B←s→P→/U18→LV

Not that it really matters, but I think you are in the reverse splitters category since your GPA is high and LSAT is average. This is just my personal opinion, but if your ambitions are to go to a T14 law school or top law school - That high GPA may masquerade your average LSAT score if you graduated from a top school or a majored in something that is known to be difficult. But, the LSAT score is still the most important piece of the application. Also "average" is a tricky word, because I heard people calling themselves splitters/reverse splitters and they have 3.5/172 or 3.8/166 LSAT scores. From the college admission conversations that I've been apart of those folks are considered in the great scores side more than "splitters" side.

I told myself if AC A is right I'll be pissed. Don't understand how this is a must be true question. We can infer that A could be the case, but i'm having trouble seeing how it must be the case.