Not trying to get into T14 or 25. Middle-of-the-pack schools with medians in the low 160s. Is it worth applying in April? I'm not waiting for another cycle, so it's a matter of applying now or in April. Is it even worth trying?
-5 to -7 on LR and RC, -11, -14 on LG. I've been doing games for over a month and my test is in 2 days pretty much. Really thought I was gonna be able to have these click but it just didn't. I thought this was supposed to be the most "learnable" part of this test? What is wrong with me
You're not alone, mate. It really is all about reps. LG by far is my worst section too. Just gotta keep grinding games out.
https://lsatdemon.com/converter converter plug into this and you'll get an idea
D is too broad and general to "seriously weaken" the argument. It sucks, but it sucks the least out of the AC's. Your paragraphs will not convince me otherwise, I promise
Choice D posits a variation in teenage sports participation across societies and decades, but this observation alone doesn't establish a causal link to environmental factors. You want to argue correlation? Okay Markymark, the crux of the educator's claim is the ineffectiveness of environmental influences, which isn't directly challenged by fluctuations in participation rates, and I definitely wouldn't say the introduction of that info "seriously weakens" the argument at all. . Without some sort of concrete evidence or SOMETHING showing that these changes result from specific environmental interventions, the argument stands. Variations could stem from myriad factors that don't necessarily correlate with the local environmental factors in question. Even though choice D introduces another variable, it lacks enough substance to decisively weaken the educator's stance. It's a shitty answer. But it's the least shitty out of all the AC's.
Heavily suggesting that something environmental is going on doesn't "seriously weaken" the argument, really at all in my opinion. What makes D the correct AC is literally all the other choices suck. The only AC that mentions an environmental influence doesn't weaken at all.
You see, you shouldn't make too many assumptions for LR because you will get punished for it. But also, you need to assume sometimes. Make sense? No? Good.
This question banks on the fact that you know Morally right isn't the opposite of morally wrong. I don't think that's a crazy assumption but the question makes way more sense if you know the two aren't opposites of each other.
Been studying since August, PT in low 150’s and best is a 157. Realistically, what kind of improvement can I expect for the January LSAT? Obviously no one can give an exact number, but I’d like to have an idea of what I could expect to be scoring in that timeframe. Any input is appreciated.
Such a stupid question, every AC is so stupid besides the right one
If I told you I had a deep fried oreo shake a week before I comitted a violent crime, but the other 364 days of the year I ate vegetables and only ate whole foods high in antioxidants, would you have attributed that crime I comitted to the deep fried orreo shake?
Where in the passage does it talk about the court being hesitant though. #help
Time eater, pick something and move on
What I did is finish CC all the way through, then I took my first PT after that. From there, you'll have an idea of what you need to work on; you'll get a great idea of this after your test when you go through your wrong answers. Don't fall for the trick of watching the explanation and then being like, "Ahhh now it makes sense, I can't believe I missed that!" Because you'll do that most times after you watch an explanation. What do you do when you miss a question and still don't quite understand why your answer was wrong? You want to dig and see where you went wrong, why your answer was wrong. Sooner or later you'll figure out you tend to make similar mistakes, then you seek to correct those. Other than that it's just consistency. Also make time to rest. Even if you don't feel burned out taking a day or two off will have you feeling a lot better when you come back.
Bro's response helped me 3 years later
Honestly I picked D but now I get why I was wrong. If it's any help to anybody, the stimulus didn't say anything about symptoms of strokes, and AC D is bringing in new information. AC B is the only other choice that makes sense here
Scheduled to take the LSAT Nov 8 and am consistently scoring in the low to mid 150's. Logic games is still my worst section, and honestly I have little faith in foolproofing. Whenever I feel like I'm finally starting to get it, I'll take a PT and see something I don't know how to handle and bomb it. There's so many games, this is starting to feel pointless. Beginning to get very frustrated. What the heck should I do? What would you do if you were me?
Would need to know what your studying look like and how much you study
JY's explanation for question 10 isn't doing it for me. Can anyone explain why A is wrong
Nah but this que is craaaaazyyy
Yeah I picked the same thing; you're doing too much work for the answer choice. Whenever you get down to two answer choices, whatever one requires you to "help" the answer choice by making assumptions the LEAST is usually the correct answer choice.