@amdhill0826 said:

I took my rescheduled exam this morning. I logged in 30 minutes early. I used the previously downloaded ProProctor set up, but it showed it downloaded again? I was connected with a proctor almost immediately and everything went perfectly well until the end. After I completed my exam, I chatted to my proctor that I was done, they did not get on. LSAC automatically timed out or booted me after a few minutes? Not sure, but I got a pop up screen that said I was logged out. The chat box was gone, so I was unable to demonstrate that I ripped up my papers.

A few things about the proctors--yesterday versus today. Yesterday, I had to show both sides of my tissues, today, they never asked. Yesterday, I had a necklace on, today I had to take it off. Yesterday, I had to show each sheet of paper, today I did not. Yesterday my bottle of water had a label, today I had to cut it off. Yesterday, I did not show under my chair, today I did. So it seems that they must have a checklist but maybe they only check a certain number of things? Not sure.

Overall, I did submit a formal complaint with LSAT yesterday and will again today. I feel my performance was affected due to the stress of yesterday and the inability to test yesterday. I missed a trip planned with my family this weekend to stay home and take this today, since the people I talked with yesterday (both LSAC and Prometric) said I HAD to complete it yesterday or today. I was only able to select from time slots 7am, 7:30am, 5pm or 6pm today. I have taken my practice tests (over 20) between 8-10am. I could definitely tell I was tired and not as focused. I'm just disappointed and venting at this point. :neutral:

I sincerely hope LSAC follows through on the email sent yesterday afternoon. I would like to retest later in the month. I hope ALL OF YOU receive successful outcomes!

I am in the same boat as you. Do you know if we can submit two formal complaints through LSAC for the August exam? I submitted one yesterday, but not sure if I can submit another one for today since technically it is the same exam. I am on hold with LSAC, but I understand their lines are super busy. Hopefully this can all be figured out soon!🙏🏼

@aliciazaetta888 said:

Hi this happened to me, eventually the wifi resumed and the test came back up but the timer kept going. They also would not let me take it on another date, so definitely should try your best to find somewhere with reliable wifi!

Got it. Thank you so much!

I am having a hard time wrapping my head around the word "sufficient." When I read E, I interpreted it as yes, the measures to increase housing and taxes would be sufficient to solve the problem, considering the stimulus says those measures are the only way to fix the problem. The the conclusion is that taxes need to be raised, which is necessitated by the measure of increased housing. It seems E covers this the best.

Maybe I am thinking of the word "sufficient" too colloquially instead of logically. Can someone better explain E and the word sufficient in this case?

#help (Added by Admin)

If C said peach trees instead of pears, would it still be the correct choice? I feel like it would work because it shows the old pesticide also did not show a reduction on another tree.

But also, we are only given info about the pear trees -- specifically that the new pesticide seems to work on it. So should I not assume anything abt a peach tree?

This is a bit off topic, but I just want to know if my thought processes are correct :)

#help (Added by Admin)

Can someone further explain C? My thought process was that if the % of HS graduates recruited rose from 2% to 15% (just random #s), then the conclusion still could hold that the armed service still depends on HS dropouts.

#help (added by admin)

Yes, this is how I understood it after blind review as well.

I had issues with this question mostly because I know very little about science. I feel as if this question expected you to have an idea what "autoimmune" means and what white blood cells are. After listening to this video explanation, it seems that they made the connection that gamma interferon and white blood cells were both antiviral weapons, when based on the stem ALONE, I thought just the gamma interferon were (again, I know very little of science).

Another thing -- I had originally chosen B because the stem said nothing about those without the MS disease, so I assumed there was no support in the passage for B. If someone could explain why B is further wrong, that'd be great!

Can someone further explain why A was right? I feel like the author never said this; while they said its almost impossible for drivers with large numbers of demerit points to be more responsible, they did not say that they should be sent to jail over re-education programs. The first sentence of the passage actually says they should face either one of the two.

#help (Added by Admin)

Can someone further explain why C is not right? It seems the first part is supports, because if violence predates the music, it's clear that the music does not incite violence, as it has existed before. But is this answer wrong because the second part of the answer choice is not supported?

#help (Added by Admin)