I switched my answer from E to C on BR because I thought I was making too many logical leaps and assumptions by selecting E. But, upon reflection of C, it is clear that this is not the main point of disagreement. If it was, then Lurano would have said something about it in his second sentence, instead of bringing up a new consideration.
I spoke to a LSAC rep after being on hold for awhile. They said that it was a mistake and that if you have score preview, you will have until October 29 to decide.
Funny part of call was when I told the rep that they should send out an email or post about it because many people are confused and they responded “maybe.”
Same issue! The email said we would have until October 28th to decide and we get 6 days to decided whether to keep or cancel... So in theory, today would be correct.
https://lsathacks.com/explanations/lsat-preptest-35/logical-reasoning-2/q-23/
^^^ This helped me understand that the ‘older/wiser’ relationship is not as solid because it isn’t definitive unless we know that everyone starts off with the same wisdom. Whereas the tree ring si very explicit that if you are older, you will have more tree rings.
I noticed on Lawhub that you cannot use the arrow keys to move to the next questions and that you have to click the 'next arrow' button. Is this everyone's experience as well? I want to make sure I practice manually clicking it instead of relying on the arrow buttons.
So, in-world = in the video game. Not in the real world?
#help (Added by Admin)
Should I use my CAS GPA or UGPA when using the 7Sage predictor? My university treated A+'s as a straight 4.0, so my CAS GPA is higher. I just don't want to have any false pretenses about what schools are targets or reaches.
Thanks!
Writing out my incorrect processes in case it helps anyone.
I was choosing between A and E.
A because I thought it suggested that the narrower wood was sturdier and probably nicer. Way too big of an assumption.
E because it seemed to show that floors are a status symbol. But, this does not do much or anything for the argument about narrow floor boards specifically.
When I looked back at the stim after BR, I realized very quickly what B was saying. I think one clue here is that the stim says "bigger" versus "smaller" houses, not just "rich" versus "poor." Bigger implies that more floorboards are needed. I should've slowed down on stim and thought more about possible loophole's/assumptions.
@
Is there a lesson for how you translated the "more quickly than" or did you just think of that yourself? It is helpful and I just want to make sure I didn't miss a lesson on it.
Thanks.
Hi me too!
For this question, I initially prephased for D. But, after reading the 'do so less frequently' I thought maybe D was too strong, saying that NOTHING requires exercising imagination. But, upon re-reading... D says "nothing fills the gap" left from radio. The 'fills the gap' leaves open that maybe some things exercise imagination, but emphasizes that nothing does so quite as much as radio and therefore you get the 'do so less frequently'