Hi! I recently completed the CC and have been struggling to come up with a solid studying plan/ schedule. I have a variable schedule, but am trying to be consistent with studying - some days, I can do 1-2 hours, and others I can do up to 3 or 4 hours. I took a PT for the first time about 2 weeks ago and got a 146, which I’m not thrilled about but working on improving. I’m aiming to take the test in either June or August. I’ve been using the 7sage study plan feature, working on drills in areas of weakness, watching live classes on topics I find confusing, but I struggle with knowing if I’m truly making the most efficient use of my study time… I haven’t just yet started working on timed practices or drills, so I know that will eventually be another factor to account for. Any advice on setting a structured study plan or finding a routine that feels like you’re making progress?
- Joined
- Jul 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Discussions
@boatengad112 I did this too - reading the above comment helped clarify a little though. I also don't think we need to be too worried about doing this since the video mentions this exercise is hard to do with sentences not in the context of an argument. I don't think I would've kicked "whose economies rely predominantly on trade" if the conclusion of the overall argument ended up being something that wasn't a Kingdom of Westeros whose economy relied solely on trade.
@MyaPapaya the subject of the first statement is "pet adoption centers." What about pet adoption centers? They need to have an interactive website AND to be a 501(c)(3) nonprofit to be eligible for the grant. You could technically take "pet adoption center" out of that and just make your lawgic statements like this:
interactive website + 501(c)(3) non profit -> eligible for the grant
For #2, on the explanation portion I can understand how the first sentence "One method of dating the emergence of species is to compare the genetic material of related species." is just the statement of a fact. At first though, I thought it could be a premise that was supported by the rest that followed. Anyone have any tips on how to distinguish that this isn't an argument?
This is a great idea! I would love to join as well.