This explanation just fried my brain, as do most of these explanations. Thank goodness for the comments section. LOL

This took me too long to answer because of the the two arguments and when I tried to rush, I got it wrong. How can I answer two arguement questions faster? Do I have to read every little part or can I only read the argument that is being weakened? There must be a tip/shortcut to answering these types of questions?

#help (Added by Admin)

It really sucks that this test is designed to make you fail. smh... Very discouraging.

So do we really need to read both arguments in questions like these or can I just read the arguement I'm weakening/strengthening? Reading & trying to make sense of Carl's arguement wasted a lot of my time.

David's secret superpower appears to be: Good Hair Gel

Interested. :)

If it says they polled "eligible voters" why would I pick the answer that says they weren't eligible to vote? This question and answer makes no sense to me.

I ruled out B immediately because it looks like it strengthens the argument. Of course there has been a notable decline in quality books written in recent years – publishers are now, more than ever, interested in making money than in publishing books of intrinsic value. It says it right in the argument. I would have never picked B because of the way I read it.

I was down to AC A & D but didn't choose D because it said "the only" and I wasn't sure what that meant.

I was stuck between AC C & D. I guessed D because I had no idea what it was saying. Lucky guess.

I didn't and still wouldn't choose B because it makes thin, "what???" This has absolutely nothing to do with the passage. It is talking about soemthing else entirely! How is this right?