- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
C made sense, but I for some reason felt like it was just summarizing the passage, and eliminated it....
I crossed out E because it says "if a person has been in a position of authority for a long time". I did not pay attention to the first sentence of the passage.
I do not think my score is good enough to give you a tutor, but I am very willing to try to answer any questions you have, and tell you what I have learned so far!!
Hi ya'll, I have been studying LSAT for about a year. I have taken the exam three times. I started off with 132, and brought score up to 143 on the second LSAT and got the same score on third one. I have used many different kinds of sites to study. Over summer, I brought score up to 151 on practice test. However, now it is down to around 145. My original goal was 160+, but it is less than in a couple of weeks till I take LSAT again ( I am not planning on retaking it again), and I do not see how I will be able to bring almost 10 points up in that short term.
Logical game is my strength, I get 0 to 5 questions wrong, so I am not focusing on logical game. I get around half questions right for logical reasoning ( I could get more than half right when I was scoring around 151 on practice exam, but now it is down to around or less than half). Reading Comprehension is terrible. I am trying to see if I can bring logical reasoning to the same level as logical game.
I have been just taking practice test and reviewing on the next day. If ya'll have any advice or studying tips or any kind of recommendations, please let me know!! I would much appreciate it!!
The passage is saying that RT (Computer modeling of reasoning tasks) is easier than CT (Cognitive tasks, sense images), and as a conclusion, we understand the analytical capabilities of our minds much better than we understand our senses. Answer D helps to justify the reasoning, because “ the less difficult it is to construct a computer model of a process, which means RT, the better understood is that process, which conclusion says…
A) If mortgage lenders are much less likely to consider risk factor, then it helps explain the fact that the proportion of defaults is higher for browsers with the highest credit score than for other borrowers.
Oh wow, I overthought…
SQ -> 6 -> No AQ
Once you notice that, you are good to go!
I debated between C and D, and I picked D. In my head, I knew it would be something like confusing between necessities and sufficient. But, I picked D -_- I guess Galindo did not talk about if an attribute is relevant or irrelevant. That is almost TOO strong..
I completely misread the conclusion. I thought it was saying that “when you take that into consideration, Robert’s debate performance, HOW REASONABLE HIS ARGUMENT was a good as Britt’s”. So i was very confused, but now it all makes sense!!!!
Okay, A does make sense. I do not think I was reading carefully. Premise on passage does not really support conclusion, because there is no correlation between them.
Oh wow…This question tricked me.
I crossed C and picked B. When I read C, “same manner as humans do”, I thought it sounded irrelevant, so I crossed out. I picked B, because in my head, every kinds of predators are different, and some do not need to camouflage, because of their other skills (like running fast or flying fast). I knew the answer would be something about the differences, so I was not completely off, but this is painful… I wanted to get it right…-_-
#help
I picked A for question 6. I still do not understand why E is a correct answer. I feel like E is too specific.. almost only talking about last paragraph. Meanwhile, A is not too specific. Anyone??
I got a conclusion wrong, so no wonder why I got this question wrong.... I like this type of questions, but if you do not pick the right conclusion, there is no way you are going to get it right...lol
C made a sense, but did not pick, because of "other than cranberries". I automatically assumed that is irrelevant.
Answer B is correct because it summarizes and supports the paragraph.
What is this paragraph's main point? - answer B
A) wrong because you do not know about "small prey"
B) wrong because of "fruits and edible roots"
C) wrong because it does not have anything to do with a passage
E) wrong because of "nomadic"
Ask "why do we believe this?" to find the conclusion and premise!
Because as a whole, the Corporate division has failed to meet its production goals for the year, that does not mean that an employee, Liang as an example, was not exceptionally productive.