Is it safe to assume that it's a MSS question if the question stem asks to logically complete the statement??
How much time do you guys allocate to reading the passage? I usually get through in ~3 min but spend too much time re-reading certain parts on inference/more abstract questions.
on (E) can we assume that new and practical applications=technologies?
Does your LSAC GPA need to be calculated in order for them to send fee waivers? One of my transcripts haven't been sent yet and I'm wondering that's why I haven't been getting them
kyungbaebryankim666
What is the best way to approach these types of questions? I'm not completely sure how I should think about them.
I already took the Sept test and signed up for the Dec test. If I don't hit my average in the Dec test, can I still take the Feb test and send in the info after all my apps are submitted for scholarship/waitlist purposes?
@ said:
ANYONE WITHOUT 3 LR SECTIONS: Do you recall a question about school implementing new rules to curve drinking on campus?
Please if anyone can answer this so I might be able to sleep tonight!!
@ said:
Really hoping the first section of LR was the experimental because I found it much harder than the other two, not entirely sure but I think the first section began with a question about drinking on campus. Can anyone confirm if this was the experimental section?
Can anyone confirm this, if the question about reducing drinking on campus was real or experm?
Yeah I had 2 LRs and this was one of the first few problems
Wow....I would've been so pissed if that had happened to me
I'm not sure how LSAC would handle this but best of luck to you...
Did the real LG have sth about two authors and assigning chapters on plants? And also a game abt parkdale (??)
I have 3 former professors who agreed to write LORs for me. Can I pick just 2 to send to law schools even after all 3 submit their letters to LSAC? I got the third letter just in case as a backup and don't want to send it if I don't have to..
Wow... missed 5 questions straight towardst the end of section 5...
Dropped my score from low 170s to high 160s
So disappointed rn
Hey guys,
I'm taking the Sept test and was wondering which exam I should take for my final PT tomorrow.
Please let me know if there are any unique or interesting question types that are not typically found in any other PTs.
Thanks!!
I got this question correct but the questionable connection between "prepared in the main kitchen" and "allowed to use that kitchen" is also present in (A). So I'm guessing that we are allowed to make that connection.
I'm taking the Sept exam and was wondering how I can get better at deciding whether to split the game board, solve by brute force or just make a basic diagram and move on to the questions. I usually rush towards the end because I spend too much time trying to split the game board or too little time making inferences. How do you guys approach different problem sets? I kind of have to get -0 in order to get the score I need...
Thanks guys!! I feel much more reassured now
Interested in this too...
Thanks for the feedback!! I will start focusing more on getting the foundation first before doing the PTs.
On yesterday’s test, I was stuck between (A) and (C). I originally bubbled in C but realized that A was the correct answer. As time was running out, I hastily erased C and bubbled in only about 60% of A before time was called.
Im pretty confident that A is the correct answer but I was wondering if the scantron machine will process A as my correct answer even if it’s not bubbled in entirely.
I actually have a damaged disc in my neck and it was a pain (literally) to sit through that test...
I took the June 2007 diagnostic last week and got a 167 on my first attempt. Which PT should I start with if I want to be ready for the September/December LSAT??
Is it better to start with the latest PTs? Any advice would be appreciated!!
> @ said:
> I remember wanting to so badly eliminate the correct AC. Since the question came down to three different ACs, all dealing with outside examples, I figured the question was doing something relatively novel.
>
> Really, the correct AC is demonstrating other instances of what is hypothesized in the stimulus. This is honestly a very subtle strengthening AC, which is a key factor in what makes this question so difficult.
>
> If a stimulus is hypothesizing a cause/effect, correlation, or a simple possibility, a strengthener may simply show that that cause/effect, correlation, or simple possibility is in fact found elsewhere. The correct AC does exactly this and shows that, on average, the occurrence hypothesized in the stimulus happens in areas with the same components.
>
> This is a pretty general answer to your question. I imagine others will add more specific input. If not, and if you're still left with questions regarding this question and its implications on other questions, I can try to elaborate.
Hey Daniel, I had some problems with this question as well. I got the right answer because (B) covered the effects of "melting of snowpacks" but I'm a little confused on why (C) is wrong. Could you please elaborate?? Thanks :D
lol.. now i have a craving for demisoda..
But anyways, I think it might not be a bad idea to just take the june/july, sept test if you're not feeling comfortable. The feb test is undisclosed and I believe the june exam starts at 12:30, which works to your benefit if you're not a morning person like me.
For LG, I think you can improve dramatically by just getting more reps in and developing some sort of intuition during the process. I personally haven't foolproofed(?) anything but I was able to go -0 during the Sept & Dec test because I could diagram quickly and feel where the right answers were.