Subscription pricing
Have 2 weeks until Aug. LSAT Flex. RC & LR consistently around - 4-5. LG consistently -11+. Need serious help guys. Should I be foolproofing games?
PT Questions
leoking99052426
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
leoking99052426
Thursday, Aug 27 2020
Hey there,
First things first, it's ok to feel sad, discouraged, and maybe even angry. We have all been there. I'm equally anxious. The same could be said for mostly everyone. It is a damn hard test. But it is not impossible. Yeah, go ahead and ignore those geniuses who get 175+. Because guess what? It doesn't matter. I found myself rushing to keep up with people who are able to go through the core curriculum in a few month and start scoring 170+. It's counterintuitive and counterproductive to compare and get anxious. I realized whether they get a 420 or a million matters little to me.
I think often our body tense up when we are stressed and stress hinders our mind from unleashing its potential. Don't worry about the dip. Look forward. Take a bird's eye view. Learning is tough, and learning is filled with fluctuations. Knowing where you fell reminds you where not to fall again. Remember how long it took us to learn how to walk? All the pain, the angst, the bruises. Yeah, that's LSAT too.
Set realistic goals. Keep your ego in check. Follow through the regimen. And trust the process. Good luck my friend.
leoking99052426
Thursday, Jun 25 2020
How does having more hospitals reduce fatalities? That is an assumption. We don't know that for sure. That's why I hesitated. Just having emergency care facilities could mean there are less doctors at each facility. We don't know for sure bro.
leoking99052426
Saturday, Jul 25 2020
got recked by AC E as I was trying to meta the heck out of it.
leoking99052426
Thursday, Jun 25 2020
I didn't use conditional logic in this case to disapprove C. I thought about it in terms of Venn Diagram. There are two scenarios. Two bubbles: Unaware (UA), Involuntary (IV)
1. UA - IV Intersect with common intersection.
2. UA completely in IV. Not all IV are UA, but all UA are IV. IV - not punished. This case doesn't weaken the conclusion. Draw it.
leoking99052426
Saturday, Jul 24 2021
eliminated D thought it was sufficient
leoking99052426
Thursday, Jun 18 2020
Can someone explain (1) how D is wrong? (2) how C is correct?
(1) D is supported. Limerick is not art + Limerick has musical qualities (sufficient for Poem) --> non-artistic poetry (or am I bad at English?)
(2) C is contradictory. If a novel has rhyme and meter --> poetry. (But novel do not usually exploit (meter/rhyme)). How can it be both a novel and poem? Is the wording "usually" that I missed?
#help (Added by Admin)
leoking99052426
Thursday, Jun 18 2020
The writers are tripping. The line of reasoning here is hella hypocritical. How can you make the inference that they don't use pheromones despite the pheromone evaporating above 45? That involves outside knowledge about basic evolutionary biology.
leoking99052426
Wednesday, Aug 12 2020
How does people buying low quality tea keep prices up, wound not the price go down?
I think I am bring in outside knowledge or do we just not care about the economic rationale at all?
leoking99052426
Friday, Jul 10 2020
yikes, this is a very badly written question. So many assumptions.
"Maintenance" - trash bag (?) how do we know what constitutes maintenance?
"minutes before" - negligent ? are to assume that minutes is unreasonable?
#help (Added by Admin)
leoking99052426
Wednesday, Jul 08 2020
I got it right by intuition, and confused myself during BR
leoking99052426
Saturday, Aug 08 2020
Wait a second. How is A even relevant? How is the treatment being different relevant to whether the disease is dangerous?
Say if we negate A. We have same treatment for OMS and CE. So what? There could be some physiological differences not expressed in the symptoms that makes CE particularly dangerous.
Also, the symptoms resemble, but are not the same. So they could be caused by different factors.
Therefore it is not required that the treatment be different.
leoking99052426
Tuesday, Jul 07 2020
(A) Finding a claim to be false on the basis it would if true have consequences that are false.
Ok, horrible sentence. NVM
Literal Translation:
Finding the cold remedy to be ineffective because it would, if it was effective, have consequences that are ineffective .
Still horrible sentence.
Let's see if we can make it clearer...
I find something to not work because working makes part of it not work.
better
I find my phone to be broken because the camera on it, suppose the entirety of the phone is not broken, is broken because I bought it.
leoking99052426
Tuesday, Jul 07 2020
Both W and H are spewing nonsense, as someone has already said, notice the analogy and move on. Don't waste your life on fictional idiots.
leoking99052426
Sunday, Jul 05 2020
I literally read unacceptable as acceptable, i think my eyesight is deteriorating with LSAT.
leoking99052426
Thursday, Jul 02 2020
I eliminated C first of all because best interest of the public and fear has no connection. And I see why D is the answer. But I have to contend for B. To just a normal undergrad that doesn't study finance or economics, "financial liability" could mean anything, financial apples or potatoes. If the writers are allowed to claim that financial liability is universal knowledge, but claim that the assumption that less financial liability is beneficial is too far fetched, we are basically conforming to one LSAT writer's standard of reasonableness, rather than an "objective" reasonableness.
leoking99052426
Sunday, Aug 01 2021
Lets admit when they started talking about pests, I know I am screwed.
party y is beating up little children. it might not matter to LSAT, but that would be pretty problematic politically