Self-study
Have 2 weeks until Aug. LSAT Flex. RC & LR consistently around - 4-5. LG consistently -11+. Need serious help guys. Should I be foolproofing games?
leoking99052426
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided
Discussions
leoking99052426
Sunday, Aug 01 2021
I think of it intuitively. It is not to prove but rather strengthen/weaken. A intuitively make sense. If this practice has been around without marxist influence, then it is more likely that this filmmaker was not influenced.
leoking99052426
Thursday, Jul 29 2021
if you are not consulted, you cannot give consent and thus fail the necessary and trigger the contrapositive
leoking99052426
Thursday, Jul 29 2021
party y is beating up little children. it might not matter to LSAT, but that would be pretty problematic politically
leoking99052426
Tuesday, Jun 22 2021
Mimicking - making the cooling more pronounced. If El Nino is mimicking volcanic cooling. It means the effect accounted for by
volcanic cooling is small.
(e.g.Think of bluffing, and imitating - these actions happen to make something look more so and so than it is)
Masking - make the cooling less pronounced. If El Nino is masking volcanic cooling. It means the effect accounted for by volcanic cooling is larges and El Nino is working to counteract (mask) it.
(e.g. You mask your achievements or your grandeur.)
leoking99052426
Monday, Jun 14 2021
For me, I got Q28 wrong because I think I inferred that saying "spiritualism is widespread" equaled Lane was interested in Spiritualism.
I hesitated about E initially, but I thought it was too far-fetched. A post-mortem explanation of why E is right could be that the author acknowledges why spirituality is an influence, but ultimately, it was commerce that influenced his depiction of nature as a humbled, altered state.
leoking99052426
Monday, Jun 14 2021
I also chose B but I think the reason it's wrong is that the luminists paintings are viewed as tranquil mysticism and it ought to be seen as a "humbled state". Yet throughout the text, we have no evidence to say that it should be viewed as wild.
leoking99052426
Thursday, Aug 27 2020
Hey there,
First things first, it's ok to feel sad, discouraged, and maybe even angry. We have all been there. I'm equally anxious. The same could be said for mostly everyone. It is a damn hard test. But it is not impossible. Yeah, go ahead and ignore those geniuses who get 175+. Because guess what? It doesn't matter. I found myself rushing to keep up with people who are able to go through the core curriculum in a few month and start scoring 170+. It's counterintuitive and counterproductive to compare and get anxious. I realized whether they get a 420 or a million matters little to me.
I think often our body tense up when we are stressed and stress hinders our mind from unleashing its potential. Don't worry about the dip. Look forward. Take a bird's eye view. Learning is tough, and learning is filled with fluctuations. Knowing where you fell reminds you where not to fall again. Remember how long it took us to learn how to walk? All the pain, the angst, the bruises. Yeah, that's LSAT too.
Set realistic goals. Keep your ego in check. Follow through the regimen. And trust the process. Good luck my friend.
leoking99052426
Wednesday, Aug 12 2020
How does people buying low quality tea keep prices up, wound not the price go down?
I think I am bring in outside knowledge or do we just not care about the economic rationale at all?
leoking99052426
Saturday, Aug 08 2020
One counterexample to A is:
COVID-19: The virus is SARS-COV-2.
Flu: The virus is the Influenza Virus.
They share a common set of symptoms. (Nasal symptoms, fever, shortness of breath)
As of writing, they have similar treatment. No "silver bullet"/vaccine for COVID yet.
Their epidemiology is both similar but also different.
Therefore, having different treatments is not necessary to the argument.
leoking99052426
Saturday, Aug 08 2020
Wait a second. How is A even relevant? How is the treatment being different relevant to whether the disease is dangerous?
Say if we negate A. We have same treatment for OMS and CE. So what? There could be some physiological differences not expressed in the symptoms that makes CE particularly dangerous.
Also, the symptoms resemble, but are not the same. So they could be caused by different factors.
Therefore it is not required that the treatment be different.
leoking99052426
Saturday, Jul 25 2020
got recked by AC E as I was trying to meta the heck out of it.
leoking99052426
Saturday, Jul 25 2020
Lawyer wants to show insanity.
He forgot to show that if someone is sane after he does something, it could show that the person was sane during it.
This is problematic to the lawyer's intention because it shows the gunner could be sane. (Therefore intentional in his actions to shoot the person -- more jail time)
leoking99052426
Friday, Jul 10 2020
I think this questions is not quite right.
If someone says "no wonder...", he is acknowledging the process of the thought of the other speaker. So the principle here would really be the environmentalist principle because the authors is recognizing the environmentalist perspective.
A says: "I can't swim."
B responds: "It is no wonder you that didn't want to come to the beach yesterday."
B is recognizing the principle underlying A's argument. (I can't go to beach because I can't swim.)
So technically, we don't know what the environmentalist are thinking. AC ABCDE could all be correct.
leoking99052426
Friday, Jul 10 2020
I agree, this question is written not very rigorously. I struggled with "failed to consider", equivalating it with "unforeseen".
leoking99052426
Friday, Jul 10 2020
Wait a sec.
Isn't it backwards?
Premise - Argument "Because books contribute to I and E, therefore we should not destroy books."
Not "Because we should not destroy books, therefore books contribute to I and E."
Am I missing something here?
#help (Added by Admin)
leoking99052426
Friday, Jul 10 2020
yikes, this is a very badly written question. So many assumptions.
"Maintenance" - trash bag (?) how do we know what constitutes maintenance?
"minutes before" - negligent ? are to assume that minutes is unreasonable?
#help (Added by Admin)
leoking99052426
Wednesday, Jul 08 2020
I guess that's an unreasonable assumption. Even despite that, the AC is wrong.
leoking99052426
Tuesday, Jul 07 2020
IGNORE ABOVE
(A) Finding a claim to be false on the basis it would if true have consequences that are false.
Ok, horrible sentence. NVM
Literal Translation:
Finding the cold remedy to be ineffective because it would, if it was effective, have consequences that are ineffective .
Still horrible sentence.
Let's see if we can make it clearer...
Suppose the the cold drug thing actually works, causing many people to use it. Because not many people use it, I find the cold drug thing to be useless.
Better, still a really bad argument.
Lets admit when they started talking about pests, I know I am screwed.