I feel like the statement that rods never contained significant amount of telerium is just not a strong enough statement to rule out the possibility of the isotopes coming from those rods. Can anyone explain it to me? #help

When I read it I was like what is the analogy even talking about?

Lol both the Japanese American dude and the Romanian dude had weird names and I got confused. That's how I got 22 wrong. I thought A was saying Noguchi experimented that during 27-29.

Bruh I made the same mistake

me too

I didn't

It's mentioned that Marsalis is seen as role model by young artists. Doesn't that means these young artists view him positively and thus would disagree with the increasingly negative criticisms?

bruh you got a year so 170 is a reasonable expectation. Like in a year if you are studying rigorously you can probably do every single LSAT prep test that has come out

For C, if it is true, then DNA of paleomen is similar to the DNA of Neanderthale, implying there is a significant difference between the DNA of paleomen and modern human, thus rendering the premise in stimulus useless.

Sentence one is only saying how meetings should be organized. How do you know the meeting Terry is going to attend is organized according to that principle? #help (Added by Admin)

Got it

what if in nature certain parasites affect both species but scientists just didn't find any in their research? this shows d isn't necessary

#help (Added by Admin)

b has negate sufficient---oldest trick in the book, but i still fell for it

I thought more and came up with a theory. When "such as diatomes" is stated, the researchers imply diatomes are one of the algae that increased in number, so saying the number of diatomes didn't increase would undermine the argument.

i made the same mistake for the same reason

MALPRACTICE!!!!!

I think in the explanation for why D is wrong is not 100% correct. In the answer choice it says chronologies, conveying a meaning that the method is to look at sources separately but comprehensively and see which of the chronologies of events offered by the sources is right. Whereas in the stimulus, the word date is used. This gives me a sense that the methodology conveyed is to exam the sources and figure out which which source offers the most credible date for each one of the events in the the line of events. The credibility of whole chronologies offered by the sources are not examined.