Tell me if I'm doing something wrong or not getting deep enough into the use of Lawgic and breaking down these examples, but I seem to get most of these correct just based on my intuition and understanding of immediately reading the problem. I understand Lawgic and why it's useful, but sometimes it overcomplicates things for me. Should I be concerned about this?
4
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
Tell me if I'm doing something wrong or not getting deep enough into the use of Lawgic and breaking down these examples, but I seem to get most of these correct just based on my intuition and understanding of immediately reading the problem. I understand Lawgic and why it's useful, but sometimes it overcomplicates things for me. Should I be concerned about this?