Hello!
I am working on my application, and I was wondering if anyone from the listed schools could contact me and share some info about the schools. Thanks.
Hello!
I am working on my application, and I was wondering if anyone from the listed schools could contact me and share some info about the schools. Thanks.
what helped me see why B was wrong was that i realized that i would have eliminated it immediately had the stim said "Everyone should have access to MULTIPLE newspapers" and not just "more than one." the author never claims that only two papers are sufficient.
this question is so terrible man please find me two people who do not know how to fix a door or a window yet somehow are able to do so when they work together that makes no sense
so A would still be incorrect even if it said "would have been lower" instead of "would NOT have been lower"?
if anyone is interested in where the first passage comes from it is a book titled "Anarchy, State, and Utopia" by Robert Nozick. i read in it one of my classes this semester and i literally started freaking out once i saw it.
i hate this question so so so so so much. all those hours spent drilling NA questions where i eliminated any choices that sound similar to SAs just for it to be correct here. cruel joke LSAC
i really did not like B because you could theoretically take it to mean that every region on Earth has plenty of water to meet its needs but some regions have vastly more water than others.
isn't B also wrong because the bill could feasibly violate human rights? #help
OH MY GOD ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME I THOUGHT B FOR 13 SAID THAT PAYNE'S VIEW WAS THE ONE THAT PREVAILED AND NOT THAT SHE WAS PROPOSING AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE PREVAILING VIEW OF THE TIME
what is so funny about this question is that a person with no LSAT experience whatsoever is probably more likely to get it right than someone who has spent months studying
everytime i get a SA question wrong the right answer becomes so glaringly obvious in review
i choose D because i read it incorrectly. for some reason i thought it said that the current physics system is less effective than the biology system of 20 years ago. if it had said that, would it be correct? #help
i felt so proud of myself for reading closely and noticing "even if this request is heeded" and thus eliminating D just for me to fall into A's trap by not reading the "residents" part
dude i feel like B requires a much smaller assumption than A like how am i supposed to just assume that horses and seals are similar what a joke of a question
Would a parallel argument to this be something like: "You can be exposed to carcinogens when you breathe polluted air outside. Therefore, anytime you breathe polluted air, you should seek chemotherapy." #help
No no no no no no no no no I do not care answer choice A is wrong 100% wrong being "qualified" is not the same thing as writing well!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! every single LSAT question tries to trick you by getting you to miss minute details and the one time I pick up on it your'e telling me it does not even matter????? no!!!!!!! this question is wrong answer choice A is wrong!!!!!!!!!
negating the analogy does not negate the argument