Doesn't this require the background knowledge that smoking causes cancer? if you didn't know the background info that smoking increases chances of cancer could you still get it correct? IDK I thought background outside information wasn't supposed to be brought into the reasoning?

Conclusion says the corporation is trying to attract NEW customers. E undermines this conclusion by providing support for the alternate conclusion that Travallier is actually trying to market NEW SERVICES to their EXISTING CUSTOMER BASE. Not NEW SERVICES to a NEW CUSTOMER BASE (like the stimulus conclusion is arguing).

How was anyone affording a computer from 1995 to 2005 lol????

I got the question right but it took me 3 minutes. RIP my LSAT score.

Im going to hate everyone named Pat now

The drill questions should start off easy but build up the intensity so towards the end of the module it can be the level 5 questions.

All the talk of dead dolphins is making me sad );