hey! I made a discord and was told the link wasn't working, so I'm resending here:)

https://discord.gg/YfxQkq3R

also, happy to meet up and study!

I chose C first round and E on BR.

The strong language in E made me think that the argument was flawed bc it failed to consider alternative hypos or in other words presumed that mental phenomena are only manifestations of physical phenomena.

can someone clarify why that's wrong. in other words, if mental phenomena (brain deficiencies) was the only reason for the symptoms (physical phenomena) then doesn't that mean we did not consider other alternative hypos?

J.Y. reading this like.... 👀

I think you might be leaving out a crucial part of E: "the requirements for" establishing the existence of one kind of causal relationship

saying it this way establishes sufficient/necessary conditions to get to the causal relationship, which is more of what the author's conclusion is saying

Whoever wrote this question can morally be gone

Hey everyone! I started a discord server for this. Thanks!!

https://discord.gg/vZdwZTAJ

I'd like to join!

#feedback - not sure if Q5 answer has a typo

Hey, interested as well. Thanks

Hope this is still going on, I'm interested. Thanks

Hey, I am interested too! Is there a group anywhere?

I still do not understand why this version of "either or" was exclusive. It seems like the sentence of "Only if" justified it, but I don't see how. Why could a driver not receive re-education AND go to jail? I consider this an "inclusive" or.

#help

I'm interested too

I would join