Need to drill in my head that "claim that (insert individual) is attempting to justify" = same as conclusion. I was looking for an answer that outright stated conclusion, did not see it, panicked, and then overthought this and choose D.
@bernardjoon1261 probably since after WSE questions i just stopped listening to the stimulus explanations and skipped right to answer explanations.
most of these questions i can tell without mapping and the mapping just confuses me a lot more half the time when jy does it (in part its his writing i think lol)
so this is why there was such a soft intro in the beginning. Someone said a question before that it felt like the quiet before a storm and their prediction was indeed true.
134 comments
Brain rot
Fr
maybe i'll be an electrician
I can be your assistant if you need one.
"I want us to practice being confused"
....way ahead of you JY
@aldertree00644 i'm cryinggggggggggggg
This explanation was way too long - totally zoned out.
Babes these questions are word soup ngl
the lawgic makes this like 20x more confusing that this needs to be lol
Need to drill in my head that "claim that (insert individual) is attempting to justify" = same as conclusion. I was looking for an answer that outright stated conclusion, did not see it, panicked, and then overthought this and choose D.
SAME!
Diabolical... this question, the explanation, the LSAT, this exhaustive list of absolute insanity.
Me: "Phew that was a tough one"
JY: "Alright tough question here"
Me: :D
bro is just yapping for the first 10 minutes
@bernardjoon1261 probably since after WSE questions i just stopped listening to the stimulus explanations and skipped right to answer explanations.
most of these questions i can tell without mapping and the mapping just confuses me a lot more half the time when jy does it (in part its his writing i think lol)
Maybe the most confusing way to say that sample size is important ever recorded.
LOL
That's LSAT's MO. No one writes like this
nvm
What did I just read?
i remain god
If I had 20 minutes on every question - like this explanation - I'd kill the LSAT.
Got tricked here
The question was not that deep
so this is why there was such a soft intro in the beginning. Someone said a question before that it felt like the quiet before a storm and their prediction was indeed true.
I think keyword "requirement" in E shouldve gave it away. I sadly picked C.
sooo why are we mapping the logical structure if we know its a conclusion and thats what the question is asking about?
IT's A CONCLUSION THEREFORE A CLAIM
ngl but the more question types i keep trying to learn, the less bandwidth i have for this shit.
I picked C in 38 seconds and wrote in blind review that I was killing it...
This was a very thorough and good lesson, thank you #feedback
As a non-native english speaker this question was outright EVIL.
As a native English speaker, I concur that it's evil