this question was easy for me based on poe. to me, the given excerpt clearly reads as the conclusion. not a premise, or hypothesis, but definitely some sort of claim, either B or E. Following this I reaffirm it as a conclusion and not a premise, therefore E
I got it correct, but only after using POE. I wasn't confident in choosing E because it didn't fit perfectly with the answer I had in mind. Definitely need more practice!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
114 comments
i am still confused why you know that its a bi-conditional relationship, maybe need to find that lesson to review.... but anyone else lost here?
i'm up
IT's A CONCLUSION THEREFORE A CLAIM
Ngl this one really got me..
not gonna lie this fried my brain
Note to self, do not second guess
the way the only reason i picked E is bc it was the only answer choice to mention the philosopher 😭
I don't think I need any "more practice being confused" lol
How do we know the claim in the square box is biconditional? I thought only indicated group 2 necessary
got this right after blind review but still feeling defeated.
"Nope, didn’t make sense." - God, did that make me feel validated.
this question was easy for me based on poe. to me, the given excerpt clearly reads as the conclusion. not a premise, or hypothesis, but definitely some sort of claim, either B or E. Following this I reaffirm it as a conclusion and not a premise, therefore E
I don't remember seeing anything about "bi conditionals"=very confused
I was getting them all right until nowl, im literally a nurse why do I wanna go to law school... lollll
#feedback let me filter by likes so that I can laugh and then see the best student explanation!
Me: "Phew that was a tough one"
JY: "Alright tough question here"
Me: :D
ngl but the more question types i keep trying to learn, the less bandwidth i have for this shit.
#help
when did we learn to disprove bi-conditional?
sooo why are we mapping the logical structure if we know its a conclusion and thats what the question is asking about?
Square, circle, triangle... J.Y. is the new Front Man.
I got it correct, but only after using POE. I wasn't confident in choosing E because it didn't fit perfectly with the answer I had in mind. Definitely need more practice!
maybe i'll be an electrician
i didn't even notice there was an answer option E , i guess i didn't scroll down enough LOL
Diabolical... this question, the explanation, the LSAT, this exhaustive list of absolute insanity.
This aint working bro