120 comments

  • Thursday, May 28

    Why is the video almost 20 minutes :(((((((

    2
  • Wednesday, May 27

    I picked E but was thrown off by the 'One kind' of causal relationship. What is the one kind ?

    1
  • Tuesday, Mar 24

    yayayay!!!!!

    3
  • Wednesday, Feb 25

    i am still confused why you know that its a bi-conditional relationship, maybe need to find that lesson to review.... but anyone else lost here?

    4
    Wednesday, Feb 25

    @LiviaLSAT like political structures don't bring about ecological or climate factors so why would the arrows go both ways

    1
    Thursday, Feb 26

    @LiviaLSAT Yes I agree. The word "only" should indicate a necessary condition. One is a lawyer only if one has passed the bar exam. A biconditional means necessary and sufficient: One is a lawyer if and only if one has passed the bar exam. If you are a lawyer, you have passed the bar exam, and if you have passed the bar exam then you are a lawyer. But a biconditional doesn't work for that because passing the bar exam doesn't automatically mean you practice law.

    1
  • Thursday, Feb 19

    i'm up

    1
  • Wednesday, Feb 18

    IT's A CONCLUSION THEREFORE A CLAIM

    12
  • Monday, Feb 16

    Ngl this one really got me..

    5
  • not gonna lie this fried my brain

    9
  • Thursday, Feb 5

    Note to self, do not second guess

    8
  • Friday, Jan 23

    the way the only reason i picked E is bc it was the only answer choice to mention the philosopher 😭

    3
  • Wednesday, Dec 24, 2025

    I don't think I need any "more practice being confused" lol

    12
  • Wednesday, Dec 10, 2025

    How do we know the claim in the square box is biconditional? I thought only indicated group 2 necessary

    3
  • Wednesday, Dec 10, 2025

    got this right after blind review but still feeling defeated.

    10
  • Saturday, Oct 11, 2025

    "Nope, didn’t make sense." - God, did that make me feel validated.

    5
  • Saturday, Sep 20, 2025

    this question was easy for me based on poe. to me, the given  excerpt clearly reads as the conclusion. not a premise, or hypothesis, but definitely some sort of claim, either B or E.  Following this I reaffirm it as a conclusion and not a premise, therefore E 

    3
  • Tuesday, Sep 2, 2025

    I don't remember seeing anything about "bi conditionals"=very confused

    1
    Thursday, Oct 2, 2025

    @WesleyNix It's back in the Foundation section. Under the Conditional and Set Logic module.

    https://7sage.com/lessons/foundations/conditional-and-set-logic/bi-conditionals

    2
  • Friday, Aug 29, 2025

    I was getting them all right until nowl, im literally a nurse why do I wanna go to law school... lollll

    9
    Thursday, May 28

    @Alexxreyeess I am a scientist but here we are.

    1
  • Wednesday, Aug 6, 2025

    #feedback let me filter by likes so that I can laugh and then see the best student explanation!

    2
  • Wednesday, Aug 6, 2025

    Me: "Phew that was a tough one"

    JY: "Alright tough question here"

    Me: :D

    19
  • Friday, Jul 25, 2025

    ngl but the more question types i keep trying to learn, the less bandwidth i have for this shit.

    14
  • Friday, Jul 25, 2025

    #help

    when did we learn to disprove bi-conditional?

    8
  • Friday, Jul 11, 2025

    sooo why are we mapping the logical structure if we know its a conclusion and thats what the question is asking about?

    14
  • Friday, Jul 4, 2025

    Square, circle, triangle... J.Y. is the new Front Man.

    10
    Thursday, May 28

    @BenPocheron lol

    1
  • Wednesday, Jul 2, 2025

    I got it correct, but only after using POE. I wasn't confident in choosing E because it didn't fit perfectly with the answer I had in mind. Definitely need more practice!

    4
  • Saturday, Jun 7, 2025

    maybe i'll be an electrician

    42
    Tuesday, Jun 10, 2025

    I can be your assistant if you need one.

    6

Confirm action

Are you sure?