@ said:

@ said:

@ said:

Do you guys ever skip questions when fool proofing sometimes...games like this, for example:

https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-2-section-3-game-3/

It makes me feel guilty a bit, but I know we aren't going to see anything like this on a current exam....

To be fair, I skipped over that specific game at first because I did not see any relevancy, but later that day I fool proofed it. I don't see a harm in doing it, it could help you make inferences easier when doing grouping games with alternating fixed slots, but the chances of a game like that showing up is probably next to 0%.

I think you've convinced me to just bite the bullet. Can't hurt, right?

Thank you! And if something similar shows up, we'll be covered, haha.

Haha yes exactly! :smile:

@ said:

Do you guys ever skip questions when fool proofing sometimes...games like this, for example:

https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-2-section-3-game-3/

It makes me feel guilty a bit, but I know we aren't going to see anything like this on a current exam....

To be fair, I skipped over that specific game at first because I did not see any relevancy, but later that day I fool proofed it. I don't see a harm in doing it, it could help you make inferences easier when doing grouping games with alternating fixed slots, but the chances of a game like that showing up is probably next to 0%.

I don't know if there is anyway to confirm that beyond doubt but I am sure It's likely that "someone" has in the past.

@ said:

The projected e-mail score date on my LSAC account shows Oct 12, 2017. This is the first time I have written an LSAT. In anyone's experience, is this an accurate timeline or are the scores given typically earlier/sooner?

I would bank on it being 1 day earlier at best, based on the past recent tests.

Good job!

@ said:

@ said:

@ said:

@ said:

@

I only had one LG section, and it was East/West, menu specials, interrogators, and student presentations.

Thanks. Did you find it to be hard, or standard?

It was far and away the easiest LG section I've come across, to the point that I'm concerned I did something wrong. People seem to be split 50/50 between agreeing with me and thinking it was quite difficult, so this is all very strange. It's definitely the real one either way, though.

I actually thought that the second LG (third section) was easier. Also, do you agree with the general consensus that there was a Shakespeare/Machiavelli game four in the real section -- the only LG section you had? I would be interested to hear from @ on this as well.

Yes that game was in the real LG as well.

@ said:

@ said:

@ said:

Upon seeing that the experimental LG was the one with foresters. I am officially distraught. I'm pretty sure I only got -2 or maybe -3 on the experimental section. The other LG I struggled with hard. Enough that I guessed in the final two questions in the last game without even reading it. :(

There's always DECEMBER!

@

I feel you. I normally don't have extra time after finishing an LG section but for the experimental I actually did. It was somehow a lot easier. The (unfortunately) real LG game just didn't click.

East/West

Food specials (darn you, Quesadillas! As if I wasn't already hungry right before break)

FGHI/QRS

Machiavellian/Shakespeare's villains

Which one did you struggle with?

To be honest, I do not know if we should trust the people who say that the real LG game is the one with East/West.

My LSAT section order was LG- LR- LG- RC- LG

This is my logic: the RC comparative passage is a lot harder than normal, so the real LG should not be much harder than normal as LSAC wants to equate the difficulty of each LSAT test to previous ones. The two LRs are quite standard. But I struggled a lot with the third LG section (which has East/West and is claimed to be the real one) and ended up leaving many questions blank or did random guess.

The other LG, which was the first section, was much more doable. Not easy, because I might not get it all correct. But this first LG section was just as standard as most LG sections in previous tests.

Hence, I do not know if we should trust the people who says the real non-experimental LG is the harder LG. I heard from certain forums that most people with only one LG think the LG is easy. It is quite reasonable to think that the LG section they has is the LG section with violin/guitar. If they encountered the only LG section with East/West in their test, I don't think they are able to say that it is easy.

Maybe those who are trying to claim that the real LG section is the LG with East/West (the harder LG section) are hoping to make us feel completely disappointed and want to cancel the score.

Nah dude, the real LG is the one with the East/West and QG rule 100%.

Mining was real

Indus Valley was graded

Really hoping the first section of LR was the experimental because I found it much harder than the other two, not entirely sure but I think the first section began with a question about drinking on campus. Can anyone confirm if this was the experimental section?

Can anyone confirm this, if the question about reducing drinking on campus was real or experm?

@ said:

@ & @

Sunny, you seem fairly sure that the 2nd LR Is the real one and Allez, you seem sure that it isn't. Allez, you mentioned something about the bear and it's habitat, do you remember any more questions from that section? It can help me post more in the thread to find out.

Thanks again guys, I really appreciate your help.

Haha yes, someone clear this up?

I just try to stay optimistic, it helps a lot! Also, believe it or not I'm even starting to enjoy studying for the lsat. :smile:

I had LR, LG, LR, (break) LR, RC

Can anyone confirm which LR was the expert. one? (My last LR section had [removed] question as the last question)

Also, for RC the judges was the real one and for games the one with students with advisors was real.

In Ontario they do not count, not sure about other countries or provinces.

"Only university undergraduate credit courses from Canadian and American universities are included in the OLSAS GPA. Diploma and certificate programs are not usually included." Quote taken from directly from OLSAS's website.

Yup, I found it super hard as well.

@ said:

Do we get the email first or should I go crazy and keep refreshing the LSAC page

Awesome job! How many sections of logic games did you have to fool proof to hit -0?

Same.

@ said:

I think that's because they were supposed to only be available with ultimate plus package. @ can better answer this. : )

Hmm, really? I thought that PT's 1-35 were available as part of the CC and 36+ was limited to certain packages.