Looking at the question closer I realize why A is right. The stim argues removing dairy → good health NOT removing dairy → lower heart disease. So the stim fails to weigh the cost/benefits of removing dairy. idk at least that's how I see it.

I don't think so because the question is not concerned with the degree of susceptibility. We are asking if the algae harms them period, or if there is another explanation for the phenomenon. So the question can be eliminated already because of that, but also because we aren't talking about large fish at all; we are wondering how/if the small fish deaths and overabundant algae are correlated, so we can disregard the comparison against large fish. The first half of this explanation also explains why B is wrong and then the second half explains how C is wrong. At least that's how I understand it, hope this helps!

presumes, without providing justification, that smaller fish are somehow more susceptible to harm as a result of overabundant algae than are larger fish.

so you first answer the questions with the time constraint as best as you can, then during blind review you go back and look at the question again, taking as much time as you need, and you can change your answer. Then whenever you see the results at the end you can see if either the answer you had the first time or the new one are correct.

First time getting 5/5 on a drill! #progress

my fav types of questions lol

same

rip the questions I get right are always low priority and the ones I get wrong are high

yes rn I'm just doing 7sage lessons and then occasionally doing drills and I think I may also start doing a practice test maybe once a week

thank u this actually makes sense

im registered for october and just recently started studying and im not sure if ill be ready or if i should postpone to November ugh