I highly suggest those who got this right still watch the explanation video because he explains in detail the verbs at the beginning of the answer choices and how to apply them to the stimulus.
#Feedback can you include an option for us to take these practice questions timed on the new version of the website? I really liked having that option.
I fear I was stuck between A and D. I ended up choosing D, but the reason A was attractive to me was because I did think the author "presumes ... that smaller fish are somehow more susceptible to harm as a result of overabundant algae than are larger fish"
JY said that there was no mention of larger fish, but I felt like the word "smallER" implied that comparison. Maybe I def overthought it, but, in my head, I asked "smaller than what." And the answer was larger fish (in comparison to the smaller dead fish). You see where I'm going (well I hope you do).
What tipped me over to D, was the "without justification." In my head, I was like I guess the author provided justification (maybe horribly so, but they did)
wouldn't B be descriptively inaccurate because it concerns itself with the matters of larger bodies of water, while the stimulus clearly dictates "this pond?"
The specifics in language always have me over thinking. I stared at this question for 7 minutes, finally the correct answer emerged. But my goodness, she was hiding in the weeds for a good long while!
Can anyone provide a clear distinction between a flaw and weakening question. I feel like its mentioned and loosely provided but not clear enough #feedback.
I hope the handwriting could be just a little more legible for future lessons. Trying to grasp new material while also trying to decipher the writings disorients my senses and I feel it's slowing down my comprehension of the material. 😞
16
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
52 comments
I highly suggest those who got this right still watch the explanation video because he explains in detail the verbs at the beginning of the answer choices and how to apply them to the stimulus.
Took me 30 seconds :D
Sees difficulty >:(
I got this right, but kinda surprised it was listed as such an easy question. Definitely required some thinking.
yay first attempt i got it right!
#Feedback can you include an option for us to take these practice questions timed on the new version of the website? I really liked having that option.
How is B descriptively accurate and A isnt?
I fear I was stuck between A and D. I ended up choosing D, but the reason A was attractive to me was because I did think the author "presumes ... that smaller fish are somehow more susceptible to harm as a result of overabundant algae than are larger fish"
JY said that there was no mention of larger fish, but I felt like the word "smallER" implied that comparison. Maybe I def overthought it, but, in my head, I asked "smaller than what." And the answer was larger fish (in comparison to the smaller dead fish). You see where I'm going (well I hope you do).
What tipped me over to D, was the "without justification." In my head, I was like I guess the author provided justification (maybe horribly so, but they did)
Can someone tell me why I'm off? Thanks :)
I cut down 1 star questions with the power of hatred that I've built up within me from failing 5 star questions
wouldn't B be descriptively inaccurate because it concerns itself with the matters of larger bodies of water, while the stimulus clearly dictates "this pond?"
i got it right, took me 6 minutes tho
"Look mom, no handles," he says, while riding a quadycle with two different sets of training wheels
BANGGGG
The specifics in language always have me over thinking. I stared at this question for 7 minutes, finally the correct answer emerged. But my goodness, she was hiding in the weeds for a good long while!
How could someone do this in 49 secs? I was just perfectly primed for this question with the last two lessons and I still went over 1 min.
I'm going to crash out
i got it right but im still not understanding the difference between flaw and weakening. #help
Yay! I do not even care that it was a 1 star and 98% of us got it correct. Just happy to be apart of the 98%.
yay!
Can anyone provide a clear distinction between a flaw and weakening question. I feel like its mentioned and loosely provided but not clear enough #feedback.
I love when I spend 2 minutes overthinking a 1/5 difficulty question
would A be the stronger AC if the last 4 words were to be erased?
LOWEST DIFFICULTY??!! what???
But doesn't E still consider Algae and the small fish, but you just flip the causal logic? Or am I interpreting this wrong?
why is it not A , I get why it is D tho
I hope the handwriting could be just a little more legible for future lessons. Trying to grasp new material while also trying to decipher the writings disorients my senses and I feel it's slowing down my comprehension of the material. 😞