#Feedback can you include an option for us to take these practice questions timed on the new version of the website? I really liked having that option.
I fear I was stuck between A and D. I ended up choosing D, but the reason A was attractive to me was because I did think the author "presumes ... that smaller fish are somehow more susceptible to harm as a result of overabundant algae than are larger fish"
JY said that there was no mention of larger fish, but I felt like the word "smallER" implied that comparison. Maybe I def overthought it, but, in my head, I asked "smaller than what." And the answer was larger fish (in comparison to the smaller dead fish). You see where I'm going (well I hope you do).
What tipped me over to D, was the "without justification." In my head, I was like I guess the author provided justification (maybe horribly so, but they did)
wouldn't B be descriptively inaccurate because it concerns itself with the matters of larger bodies of water, while the stimulus clearly dictates "this pond?"
The specifics in language always have me over thinking. I stared at this question for 7 minutes, finally the correct answer emerged. But my goodness, she was hiding in the weeds for a good long while!
Can anyone provide a clear distinction between a flaw and weakening question. I feel like its mentioned and loosely provided but not clear enough #feedback.
I hope the handwriting could be just a little more legible for future lessons. Trying to grasp new material while also trying to decipher the writings disorients my senses and I feel it's slowing down my comprehension of the material. 😞
So on these questions - I immediately cross out anything that brings in new information. (i.e., larger fish)? #help (Added by admin)
7
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
50 comments
Took me 30 seconds :D
Sees difficulty >:(
I got this right, but kinda surprised it was listed as such an easy question. Definitely required some thinking.
yay first attempt i got it right!
#Feedback can you include an option for us to take these practice questions timed on the new version of the website? I really liked having that option.
How is B descriptively accurate and A isnt?
I fear I was stuck between A and D. I ended up choosing D, but the reason A was attractive to me was because I did think the author "presumes ... that smaller fish are somehow more susceptible to harm as a result of overabundant algae than are larger fish"
JY said that there was no mention of larger fish, but I felt like the word "smallER" implied that comparison. Maybe I def overthought it, but, in my head, I asked "smaller than what." And the answer was larger fish (in comparison to the smaller dead fish). You see where I'm going (well I hope you do).
What tipped me over to D, was the "without justification." In my head, I was like I guess the author provided justification (maybe horribly so, but they did)
Can someone tell me why I'm off? Thanks :)
I cut down 1 star questions with the power of hatred that I've built up within me from failing 5 star questions
wouldn't B be descriptively inaccurate because it concerns itself with the matters of larger bodies of water, while the stimulus clearly dictates "this pond?"
i got it right, took me 6 minutes tho
"Look mom, no handles," he says, while riding a quadycle with two different sets of training wheels
BANGGGG
The specifics in language always have me over thinking. I stared at this question for 7 minutes, finally the correct answer emerged. But my goodness, she was hiding in the weeds for a good long while!
How could someone do this in 49 secs? I was just perfectly primed for this question with the last two lessons and I still went over 1 min.
I'm going to crash out
i got it right but im still not understanding the difference between flaw and weakening. #help
Yay! I do not even care that it was a 1 star and 98% of us got it correct. Just happy to be apart of the 98%.
yay!
Can anyone provide a clear distinction between a flaw and weakening question. I feel like its mentioned and loosely provided but not clear enough #feedback.
I love when I spend 2 minutes overthinking a 1/5 difficulty question
would A be the stronger AC if the last 4 words were to be erased?
LOWEST DIFFICULTY??!! what???
But doesn't E still consider Algae and the small fish, but you just flip the causal logic? Or am I interpreting this wrong?
why is it not A , I get why it is D tho
I hope the handwriting could be just a little more legible for future lessons. Trying to grasp new material while also trying to decipher the writings disorients my senses and I feel it's slowing down my comprehension of the material. 😞
So on these questions - I immediately cross out anything that brings in new information. (i.e., larger fish)? #help (Added by admin)