Thank you 7Sage for helping me improve my LSAT Score by 16 points! Utilize all that they have to offer, it works!
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
I'm interested
I would suggest revisiting lawgic because once you translate mbt questions to lawgic, it leads you to the answer. This question type was if A then B. If B then C. In the lawgic lesson they taught us how to then conclude that if A then C. Which is how I found the correct answer but had I not known that I don't think I would have gotten the answer correct. It also helped me as I was learning lawgic to practice on a scratch paper as he taught it. There are parts of lawgic he suggests we include such as kicking things up to the domain and and implementing quantifiers which doing those details on test day won't help with time but as you practice those details you'll start to take note mental notes of them as you catch it but the fundamentals of lawgic itself are needed.
Hope this helps someone:
The “most” arrow must go before the “all.” Because, if you say all A-B and then "some" from B-C you can’t conclude A-C because we’re not sure that B carried over the portion of A to go into C. But if you do most A-B and all B-C we can conclude that A to C because it guarantees that all B went into C.
I'm interested. Please add me.
I created a Quizlet to practice different examples with it's terms
https://quizlet.com/990589469/argument-flaw-cheat-sheet-flash-cards/?i=2g51o6&x=1jqt