For question 7, I get why AC A is conceivably the most supported AC. However, I felt that the burden of proof for AC A is still too high as compared to the support provided by the passage. After all, I don't see how literally EACH of Dove's work can be cleanly categorized as either poetry or fiction. The author only provided certain examples in which there seems to be a nexus between the genres and that one genre seems to prevail over the other. How are we supposed to generalize and make the assumption that there does not exist any other work from Dove that is far more nebulous in its formal literary structure that cannot be so cleanly categorized?

I chose AC D, while now I see there is no support for it in the passage, still seemed to me be the lowest burden of proof since the author seemed to have a stronger affinity towards the fusion of two genres rather than merely one, given the tone of the passage.

Please provide insights!

It seems to me that 5.2 is a mere set of stated facts and that neither statement gives any support to the other statement for the sake of some definitive point? Can someone explain?

i didn't choose E because I thought it was not something entirely supported by the stimulus and required outside assumptions (granted, those assumptions are rather intuitive in that we know contemporary keyboards are pretty effective and less jam-prone) that modern keyboards don't possess the susceptibility of jamming. However, I thought that that was something that was not explicitly mentioned in the stimulus and not something that could have been inferred from the stimulus in a reasonable manner without using outside common sense, which I think this test often discourages. So I was wondering if there's any way from information solely within the stimulus that E could have been more readily apparent. I chose A because I thought E was wrong as it required too many unsupported assumptions from the stimulus. But I also did not like A when I chose it.

got this question right but just wanted to say, AC B is some next level bruh moment

I got the question right, but I was oscillating between A and C for a while and the video didn't really explain C too much in mind. I was wondering if anyone can explain why C is wrong thanks!

hey im interested, discord username mingwei7325

also would like to join, username is mingwei7325

#Help A bit confused on Q10 in that I understand it is to depict the aspects of contemporary lives. However, I also felt that the comparison was within the greater sphere of discussion revolving around comparison to abstract expressionism and felt that it was to compare and elucidate how there weren't those aspects in abstract expressionism, shouldn't C be the primary reason?

#help I understood the stimulus completely yet I chose E for the following reason, which makes sense in my mind so can somebody help me to understand why this thinking might be incorrect. I thought that if the parliament was more attuned to public sentiments, then the reason behind why the parliament passed the resolution was to demonstrate to the public that their anti-war sentiments were justified and heard and that the parliament stood with them despite the fact that most of the MPs actually support the intervention nevertheless. I thought it was more so a reconciliation with the public and a purported public demonstration of sympathy to the people. I thought B made sense also, but it just seemed like too much of a stretch to consider that the parliament would condemn the PM's action solely on the grounds of "turf war", which is more counterintuitive. Not sure if this made sense and thank you!

#help I chose A because I felt that even though the culinary practices of North America was changed as a result of the emigration, I wasn't sure if the culinary practices of these various emigrated groups were changed as part of the changing practices in North America. My thought was that it would have been very much possible that the practices changed the local cuisines, yet the groups themselves remained faithful to their own practices by changing the local cuisines. Not sure if this makes sense or if I was making too many assumptions along the way. B is definitely more correct in retrospect though.