After Blind review i got 4/5 from a 2/5!!! It's really great to see some progress and actually see the difference in fast (the first round) and slow (blind review) but it's helping!!

This helped, but i swear every time JY says "com-PRA-ble" I have to translate to "com-Pair-able"

It only says "low priority" because you got the question right. meaning its not a high priority for you to focus on, because you got it right.

$

#feedback

I second this. Based on the previous lessons, why aren't we flipping and negating?? How is this not J→F = /J→/F?

No worries! Don't overthink it, because that's the point of the negation, to find the necessary condition.

Example:

No birds are trees.

- Our two main concepts are bird and trees.

- Pick one concept (in this case bird)

- Negate bird (ex. /bird). By negating bird, you are making it the necessary condition. Making trees the sufficient condition to look like this trees→/bird

Which makes sense right when translating it bak to English:

If it's a tree then it is not a bird.

Do the contrapositive:

Lawgic: bird → /trees

English: If it's a bird then it is not a tree.

I hope that was helpful! Please anyone correct me if I'm wrong! You're all doing great!!

You find the both main concepts, pick one of them. Negate that one. Make it the Necessary condition (the right side of the arrow).