deleted
PT 13, Sec. 2, Q26. Does "the only" in answer choice B refer to a necessary, or sufficient condition? Also, what exactly is "the condition" and "phenomenon" in B? Thanks
Admin note: edited title and edited out "#help" *The "#" marks a heading.
don't think an extra degree is worth it, esp. if you're tagging on more loans. I guess you can always take some PP courses that you're interested in, and leverage that without getting the degree. As for WE, people from all walks of life attend law school.. you don't need something crazy impressive.. it's not B-school
#help
for Q. 27 in A, "without providing details." How are we to interpret "details"? I'm guessing LSAC doesn't mean details in a colloquial sense? Thoughts?
i think the key to question 22 is in the third paragraph where the author discusses both criticisms as one entity, and says they see philanthropy as a prelude to state charity, as though state charity was inevitable
#help Can someone parse out the grammar for answer choice D, Q27 more precisely? And also parse out the grammar for the first sentence of the last paragraph? Thanks
#help ok.. so for question 13, the passage states that "... but their taped conversations occasionally contained some spanish with no change in situational factors" (lines 53-55). BUT answer choice A is talking about when situational factors changed. I went with A when timed, but switched to E because of that during review. So, is the implication here that there WAS a change in situational factors when the family switched to Spanish? That seems to be the only way that situational factors can account for the "phenomenon" in the passage. If so, wouldn't that be a direct contradiction of the passage? Really confused
How accurate is this ETS conversion score tool? Do you think law schools will use it? A 167V & 166Q give you a 173 LSAT. Also do you guys think more law schools (such as Stanford/Yale/UChicago) will start accepting GRE for the 2018/2019 cycle?
https://www.ets.org/gre/institutions/about/law/comparison_tool?WT.ac=gre_law_comparison_180302&utm_source=general&utm_medium=general&utm_campaign=gre&utm_content=law_comparison
Never mind. Looks like you're right. Thanks!