I'm interested!

Hi, I'm in Florida! would love to join.

Did anyone translate this like

HTF appropriate --> /LF --> S and BV --> WT

i guess i translated swags and balloon valances included in what's appropriate as a logical statement rather than just thinking of it as an example, but is that not right to do? someone please helppp. #feedback

How the hell do you get better at questions like this, where the logic is difficult and the grammar is hard to parse? genuinely looking for specific advice/recommendations.

did anyone else interpret the stimulus' "however" as a way to disagree with the claim that rock music became more artistic? i thought the historian was saying, however, it's not try that rock music is artistic because ... and that set me up to choose answer choice B. Anyone know how to rectify this so I don't do it again?

i don't think so , i think that's pretty standard. my understanding based on what my college pre law advisor told me is that submitting before mid/late november is considered early still.

how the f are u supposed to know what's fluff when ur taking the question

did anyone else completely not translate the gaurentee. like how are we supposed to know that that matters here? i just translated that sentence to Large Nurseries -m-> disease free. I would never think to identify the gaurentee as the important part...

I also had this experience! currently still in the thick of it and honestly probably a little scared to take my next practice test, as it could be my last before the November exam. I was improving for a while and then suddenly started getting consistently lower scores multiple times. For me it had so much to do with nerves and confidence, and my theory was also that i was understanding things better but often applying them incorrectly or at the wrong times, or that since i was understanding more i wanted to get more questions right, and thus lost time spending too long on each individual question. I have been trying everything and the stress of it doesn't subside, so I'm just hoping that if I keep trying something in my brain will click before the exam and help me rather than hurt me. best of luck : )

question - if the correlation between journalistic style and novel popularity was strong, the conclusion would still be flawed right, because it would be taking correlation to be equal to causation?

sometimes i am grateful for my anthropology degree

Did anyone else read the passages with the understanding that passage A indicates a much larger role on the part of the reader in the discussion of genre whereas passage B implies more that it is entirely the authors doing? A says that what joins texts in a genre is the way they are read, not their formal elements, whereas B says that what unites texts in a genre is the reading protocol they are written with. That's the relationship I had in mind while reading these, and I guess it has caused me to run into problems because in question 17 I chose B for the reason that I thought B's perspective was that genre classification falls on the author and the reading protocol they write with. it doesn't say that the texts in genres are united by how readers interpret them, it says that the texts most central to a genre are those that were written with this intention. help T_T

for question 11, did anyone go into the passage to identify the relationship between eye closure and cognitive before going into the answer choices like JY did? I feel like that's a lot to reread during the exam and you don't even necessarily know that that is where the detail they will use is located. On the other hand, I didn't do that and was totally lost in the answer choices because I didn't pick up on the characteristics i was supposed to be looking for (that eye closure is used in cognitive interviews and both have equivalent witness recall). I know he does so in the video, but I don't know if that's for the sake of going in depth during review or if that's what you should do on a question like this on the exam. Just confused on the strategy on this one, especially if those details don't immediately occur to you.