Answer (E) rests upon the assumtion that motivation does not have a maximum. What if motivation functions like a bucket of water or the charge in your cell phone rather than the height of a kid or how well you read?
I'm not saying it does, I point that out only to show that its still the de facto answer because its the only one that pertains to the argument. It seems to me the lesson here is that it's easier/ quicker to rule out an answer on grounds of relevancy than actually engage with the merit of it's logic.
1
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
Answer (E) rests upon the assumtion that motivation does not have a maximum. What if motivation functions like a bucket of water or the charge in your cell phone rather than the height of a kid or how well you read?
I'm not saying it does, I point that out only to show that its still the de facto answer because its the only one that pertains to the argument. It seems to me the lesson here is that it's easier/ quicker to rule out an answer on grounds of relevancy than actually engage with the merit of it's logic.