I thought the idea of NA's were to in essence seek a minimally supporting assumption that would tie into the argument. Based on the conclusion of this one, I figured the idea was that the apples aren't washed because of the greasy residue. I understand the reasoning but am I wrong in my assessment

#help?

completely missed the logical indicators and the conditional logic that goes into this. Great question, man these question makers are nasty with it!

E is not descriptively accurate?

#help (Added by Admin)

Yah i read this one too quickly lol

I was thinking D the entire time the wording completely messed me up tho. Well played question maker... well played.

interested pls add!

yah i just misread the stimulus, kindof ignored it for the sake of time, got it on BR.

Don't even understand what this one is saying so im tacking this one under wgaf.

Can someone tell me what is the main difference between SA's and PSA's. Right now it seems its just the question stems of PSA's are slightly more tricky to identify. Otherwise I am approaching them both in more or less the same fashion.

#help (Added by Admin)

I'll be there! thanks again

listen, I know that there's only one right answer. But how in the hell does D strengthen the argument. It doesn't explain the trivial decrease in smoking in the township... I would never get this one right. I find it hard to believe that based on our lessons and previous examples anyone would. I need more answers!

#help (Added by Admin)

is it sufficient to say that it's not correct because it is not really a conclusion?

I figured that the higher the GNP meant more economic power. IDK

I do not even know what exactly B was saying.

#help (Added by Admin)

am down

am down

count me in

link is no good but i am interested

interested ! the discord link you provided is no good

I'm down!