- Joined
- Aug 2025
- Subscription
- Live
@SM_ not sure how long you've been studying but as someone relatively new, all of my drills are untimed right now in order to give me time to look over notes and talk my way through these concepts. Looking to be able to move onto timed drills soon.
@AnnaWallace0321 I like to write out the example on paper and circle the sufficient/necessary indicators and denote them as G1 or G2. Since the conditions for each come directly after the indicator, I can see which is which
Tiger: the air conditioning shouldn't be running all the time. Electricity is expensive and running AC can raise your bills.
Disney: The author stated that anyone who can answer his question must have either read his book or received a spoiler. JP was able to answer the question with no hesitation. JP is illiterate. So, JP must have received a spoiler.
Cat: A man was running south on Life Ave. A body was found in an alley behind the restaurant on Life Ave. The policeman believes the man who was running killed the person found.
For #1, does the statement about cross sections of pigs teeth having bands not support the first sentence of the teeth of some mammals showing growth rings?
The Disney argument is the strongest due to the premises being connected and leading to a conclusion. The tiger argument has a conclusion that is supported by an example of a dangerous mammal. The trash argument is weakest because it relies on speculation and assumption-the premises do not support a concrete conclusion
cannot=G4 and unless=G3. So why is SAS being placed on the left side of the when the translation rule states we negate G4 it becomes necessary?? Struggling to understand the explanation on this one