- Joined
- Aug 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Tiger: the air conditioning shouldn't be running all the time. Electricity is expensive and running AC can raise your bills.
Disney: The author stated that anyone who can answer his question must have either read his book or received a spoiler. JP was able to answer the question with no hesitation. JP is illiterate. So, JP must have received a spoiler.
Cat: A man was running south on Life Ave. A body was found in an alley behind the restaurant on Life Ave. The policeman believes the man who was running killed the person found.
For #1, does the statement about cross sections of pigs teeth having bands not support the first sentence of the teeth of some mammals showing growth rings?
The Disney argument is the strongest due to the premises being connected and leading to a conclusion. The tiger argument has a conclusion that is supported by an example of a dangerous mammal. The trash argument is weakest because it relies on speculation and assumption-the premises do not support a concrete conclusion
cannot=G4 and unless=G3. So why is SAS being placed on the left side of the when the translation rule states we negate G4 it becomes necessary?? Struggling to understand the explanation on this one