furthermore we have no idea it is damp or not. because if it was enough he would be fine with it. the question stem doesnt include that. please expand further on this as im shocked that it was only a 30 second explanation of the answer choices considering how feasible 1-2 of them are.

Really bad explanation for question 6 honestly.

Prescribed fire management includes letting the lightning ones burn if it is damp enough and prescribed fire managemnt is essential for his new approach as mentioned earlier in the paragraph. So why is it that it is not essential if it is a policy that should be adopted if it were damp enough? Really like a 30 second explanation of the answer choices is quite ridiculous. Please make another explanation video on that last question.

same im confused about that

you read the answer C completely wrong. Why am i paying you 70 dollars a month for this service if you are not reading the answers completely and just rushing through to get it done? completely scrap this explanation and make a new one. unbelievable.

404 for me too stop this fix it i dont pay 30 bucks a month for this site to go down

wasnt sure about that either. I would assume it would be J and S -> CF

and then /J and /S -> /CF

and that

/J -> ? doesnt conclude anything - plan could fail or not fail

/S -> ? doesnt conclude anyting - plan could fail or not fail

as they dont have a relationship with each other so we would not be able to know what happens if only one of them was /

yeah confused about that as well somebody pls respond

i would like to join as well. however my cold diagnostic is a 152 and i have just begun studying. please feel free to message me