User Avatar
nehe2dancy730
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

User Avatar
nehe2dancy730
Wednesday, Jun 5, 2024

God-willing. We got this

12
User Avatar
nehe2dancy730
Monday, Jun 3, 2024

INTERESTED !!! What are the next steps to join?

0
User Avatar
nehe2dancy730
Friday, May 31, 2024

You see in the stimulus that the author does not give THEIR own position/stance until the "however" part.

This is, not always, but a clear indication that this is the point of their argument. The author is letting you know that "hey, these planes are being developed to hold more things...HOWEVER, that space is more than likely going to just hold additional passengers."

And then the premises after that support the "however" part.

Answer A does not do this. It does not show the main point or conclusion but just restate the premise in the stimulus. We already know these gigantic planes are being developed. The author doesn't agree or disagree with that, they're just saying that.

However...Answer B is showing us what the conclusion is, or what the author's main point is, which is that these developments for the planes are more than likely going to assist in additional seating. This is something that the author in the stimulus claims.

1
User Avatar
nehe2dancy730
Thursday, May 23, 2024

real.

0
User Avatar
nehe2dancy730
Monday, May 13, 2024

i think because you are changing the probability now. You went from will to might

Will is a must word. That issues 100% certainty. The main sentence is that Harry or Ron will enroll in class. So we know at least one of them will enroll. It could be both of them, but one of them will

17
User Avatar
nehe2dancy730
Thursday, May 9, 2024

Cars that fly = subject

Cars (noun) that fly (verb) = this is a subject that is modified by what? A "flying" modification. It cuts down all cars to only those that fly. This is what modifiers do.

8
User Avatar
nehe2dancy730
Wednesday, Apr 17, 2024

how does the statement of "companies that specialize in developing software and technology solutions are relatively limited in number..." support any of the other premises? I'm assuming you think "Job opportunities in the tech industry are expanding"? Yet the first sentence I mention how that doesn't support this. It actually weakens it.

If there is a limited amount of roles available, then how is opportunity expanding?

0
User Avatar
nehe2dancy730
Wednesday, Apr 17, 2024

HERE !!!!

1
User Avatar
nehe2dancy730
Wednesday, Apr 17, 2024

LETS GOOOOOOO IM GONNA ACE THIS TEST

6

Confirm action

Are you sure?