Can you read FLAWS similar to RRE? This reads and feels like an RRE question.

#help

How far apart are you taking PTs? One every other day or something? Also, how long are you spending on BR?

Too distracted by those bears. Did you draw those bears?

#help (Added by Admin)

When do you apply the "char method" where you read one author and measure against the answer choices, and when do you read both then attack the ACs? What is the preferred method?

#help

Generally, what do we call this flaw?

#help

What is the contrapositive of the SA?

#help

How would we describe this flaw?

#help

I am also confused. Why is it that the "without" is not used as a group three negate sufficient?

#help

I didn't use the proper tactics to tackle this quiz. Cookie-cutter mistake. Fack.

I tackled this as a disagree question. I got it wrong. Fack.

I chose E.

E is wrong because it does not help build the support between the premises (that a computer can do all these things provided it has the right hardware) and the conclusion (therefore visually impaired people can access information from computers more easily). Fack.

I forgot to use the negate-destroy strategy. Fack.

So control/command F is allowed to be used during the test?! I intentionally have not ben using it in practice because I did not think it would be allowed on test day.

Nahh, AkLSAT2020 is wrong. You are making a correct assumption. I work as a middle school teacher. I can promise you that when students mispronounce a word that they are unfamiliar with, they continue to mispronounce it until corrected by someone else.

How would you map this out with the embedded "except"?

#help

When reading the stimuli, I couldn't form a good enough mental image.

25 - Fack . . . I chose E. . . Under testing conditions. . .and blind review. My thinking was that B was too simple and that E was a justified inference.

A) Wrong. The author is skeptical of the second theory.

B) Correct. The author mentions that this process has not actually be observed.

C) Wrong. Supports the new theory, that our author disagrees with.

D) Wrong. This also supported the second theory. Our author would likely not agree with this.

E) Wrong. At odds with what the author notes about circumstantial evidence.

I feel for the tone of the author over the main point. I chose D. Fack.

Answer choices

A) Does not strengthen the claim that the Negro Units are "truly national". Perhaps trap answer in that it does strengthen the claim that that the Units were a "truly . . . black theater"

B) Does not strengthen the claim that the Negro Units are "truly national". Perhaps trap answer in that it requires an assumption that government funding=national.

C) Keyword PRIOR . . . Negro Units only in some large cities. Now it is everywhere. C is correct.

D) Number of people attending have nothing to do with being "truly national"

E) Requires assumption that because they have had difficulty, they have not found documents. Does not mean that such documents were not found. Bad answer . . . . . . I chose this one😔

I chose A under testing conditions as well. On review I think I see the issue; the stimulus tells us that there are actually many factors that contribute to the price of material: labor cost (infer time spent working), fashion trends (infer demand for material). All of which amounts to "cultural trends" (how much we pay workers, how long they work, what is fashionable, and what material is in demand). I think? #help

#help Are strong test-takers notating this questions under testing conditions, similar to what JY is doing in the video?