Yeah even now I have to POE to get to A, luckily the other ACs are very obvious in their mistakes.
Its not that serious, for the writing portion of the exam they just record your webcam. You don't have a live proctor. The only thing you need to avoid is people around you and having scratch paper right in front of you.
My test was scheduled at 3pm, stuck around till 4:30pm. I asked Dave Killoran @ powerscore what to do since it seemed like he was in contact with LSAC. He said to walk.
As I was exiting the app I finally got connected to a proctor. I thought about taking it, but ultimately decided against it, I was burned out from stressing out about everything and I had told my roommates my test window so they would have came home while I was mid-test.
I filed a complaint with LSAC prior to that so I guess I call them tomorrow or something to confirm and use this day to do a practice run of a PT.
Not sure if it was a good call or what LSAC is gonna say since I ultimately got connected and declined it, but considering I haven't even done a question and I'm exhausted I think I would have probably bombed it.
Nope
If you use Hillary and Trump for Tanner and Lopez the question makes more sense
This used to happen to me when my internet connection was shoddy. I found if you refresh the page after the error, you can find the newly made drill in "Show existing Drills" tab.
I'm late but I thought the same thing but upon closer reading I think the "maintain a healthy balance" assumes that there's already a satisfactory amount of micronutrients. With the answer choice we know that we are not allowing the grass to decay, striping out the micronutrient.
Yeah I believe I just completely miss interpreted the "two different state of affairs", because I landed on the flaw, eliminated the A,B,E, and held onto C and D
Then interpreted D's "two different state of affairs" as referring to the control group and the experimental group so I eliminated it based of that.
I wasn't happy with C, but just stuck to it and moved on.
you don't get bonus points for getting the hard questions right, you're better off going after the easier questions first.
Can someone go through this question and explain their thought process?
I think I was thrown off by this for two reasons. First, I was uncomfortable drawing the conclusion that Self Help books -> less visits and secondly, in the answer choices what "state of affairs" was referring to exactly?
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of question”
I think the problem with C is more basic/fundamental, it does absolutely nothing to suggest whether we should or shouldn't remove bats from buildings specifically.
Even if it was bolstered C to say "All animals that carry rabies..." instead of "Most animals..." it would just widen the scope of the conclusion (strengthening the conclusion it in a way).
There already is one.
Its usually referred to the negative consequences/side-effects associated with the ingestion of medications and other compounds (food, drinks, other medications).
Like one of the most deadly combinations is prescription pain killers (opioids) or benzos (anti-aniexty medication) with alcohol. It causes respiratory depression (you can stop breathing) and/or significant impairments in coordination (like 1 drink feels like 10).
Even common medications like Tylenol mixed with alcohol can be terrible for you. They both metabolize in the liver so it can lead to long term damage (so don't take it for a hangover).
@nessaaar258 if you've done BR in the drills, just click on the number next to the question and it will give a drop down of place to input your BR answer choice. You can also press the "~" button.
80s are hard, I wouldn't stress too much about it. Just BR them thoroughly.
I think you should BR it to get a good baseline of your abilities untimed, so when you finish the curriculum you can see how far you've come.
Sort of... I believe it can be used two ways depending on context, that's why its not on the cheatsheet. The first is a like group 3 (negate sufficient) as used in your example and second is "and not" which is the actual more official translation.
Here is it shown the other way
People 'and not' "no direct experience on matter" -> don't defer to journalists
simplified: People & direct experience on matter -> /defer to journalist
It works here as a group 3 here because people is an encompassing term but if it was something more important specific it falls apart (instead of people it was something more specific like students) especially if you're running the contrapositve.
Here's a more clear example "Picasso paintings except for those during his blue period do not have dull colors"
PP-picaso painting
BP-blue period
DC- dull colors
Picasso painting and not Blue Period -> no dull colors
PP & /BP -> /DC
This illustrates if your running the contra positive it can be.
DC -> /PP or BP
Dang I initially picked D but my thick self read E as "most donut eaters also eat a bagel too in one sitting" (the negation) and I related to that.
You're making the assumption that if the drug works slower it must be more ineffective, you cant make that assumption since we don't know enough information. Additionally the negation of significantly faster isn't "slower", it could be just tiny bit faster or the same speed.
80s are tough, I wouldn't stress to much about it
35 min X 200% = 70 min
If you go on the analytics page (under the practice tab), on the chart that shows your LR question analysis. Hover your mouse over the circles and you can see the average amount of questions per test.
Although I'm not sure if this has been updated to reflect the current 3 section test.