to agree to a demand

chiweewee

Thank you! The laymen's terms explanation makes it much clearer. I appreciate it!

When I finally take this test, I think I'm gonna read every sentence with a patented JY "Okayyyy?"

I realize that I misunderstood that it was the conclusion, but, from a feedback point, can each answer choice be explained or identified. Like generalization, hypothesis etc. In terms of the way LSAT uses them.

Why is C not considered an assumption? It says it probably will improve productivity. Is that not an assumption that it will improve something. I would also understand it being a hypothesis.

The answer choice doesn't mention that it's an analogy AND it says that it is NOT evidence for the conclusion. The statement in question IS evidence for the conclusion. Hope this helps :)

Something is a given. It is assumed from the get go. It's true.

Are comparatives typically bad answer choices?

Also is there a lesson that explains mixing up the sufficiency/necessity conditions explicitly. I understand the difference but I am having a hard time understanding how saying something like "only if" makes something a necessary condition like in the last question. Thanks!

Can someone explain what he means by "bridging". I got this question right intuitively by matching the stimulus and its parts in order it to the answer choice. Thanks.

I still can not do conditional chaining very well but I'm getting these questions correct, if I can just do this intuitively, can I skip the chaining to save time? I can see writing it out would help if I'm stuck but otherwise seems like it takes too long to be helpful to me PLUS I don't think i'm writing it out properly anyway.

Just did a TEFL Course, glad to know all the grammar they taught (very in depth) will do me some good on the LSAT.