This is more a MSS questions than it is a MBF question. Thanks to JY's lessons, I know that answer choice E COULD be true, therefore it cannot be the answer (in the context of a valid MBF question). Unfortunately, this problem is grouped into the MBF problem set, which it shouldn't be. I spent more time than I should've on it- simply because there wasn't a valid MBF AC. AC E relies on assumptions, which we know not to use in MBT or MBF questions.

Thank you for sharing this

https://www.flashcardmachine.com/powerscore-indicator-wordsforlsat.html

I'm certain that in time they will. Might not be as soon as you expect but probably wont keep you waiting for a while.

You say you never subscribed (you wrote subscripted, lol) to 7sage, so how can you know what it does and does not offer? I can tell you and everyone reading this that 7 sage has opened my eyes and thought process to new horizons and without their program, I doubt I could be at my current level with the time and effort I've put into it thus far. You sound very troubled, I hope you get well soon.

"You should know this from our advanced logic lessons on biconditionals." As I've navigated the SA and PSA lesson section, its become glaringly obvious that the explanation videos are pulled from reviews of LSATs themselves, and not crafted to fit the material of the lessons. This video explanation feels like I've just taken PT 35 and am reviewing it in the order of questions presented on that test- it does not feel like its been uniquely crafted to help CC students in this lesson. If you decide to use certain problems for problem sets, all problems and their video explanations should include lawgic diagramming and detailed explanations in the context of what the lessons are teaching. I'm not saying that all videos lack the lawgic diagramming- most of them do. Im saying that every single video must include it, and not doing so harms those who are practicing it. That would absolutely help clear up a lot of the confusion that students are expressing in the comment section, including myself. For example, we haven't even arrived at biconditional statements, yet we've encountered a few of those problems, this one included. #help

Dude. What was the point in learning all of the logical conditioning statements and working through all those drills if they aren't even presented in the explanations. This whole SA section has really let me down. I've had great things to say about 7sage right up until SA problem sets. The explanations, the use of biconditional problems in problem sets when we haven't even reached that point in the curriculum yet, and JY always leaving something out of the explanations has been incredibly frustrating to say the least. For students like myself who are struggling with SA and trying very hard to master it, neglecting to include the lawgic and how its applied is unacceptable. It'll probably fall on deaf ears, but based on all of the comments I've read from every single problem and their sets, this SA section for 7sage needs to absolutely be reworked. To be clear, every lesson on SA was very useful, clear, and concise. These problem sets do not reflect what the lessons have taught and their explanations are extremely lacking with regards to the lawgic that 7sage wants us to use and apply. Otherwise, its much easier to fall back on intuition to solve these problems, which defeats the whole purpose of this section. #help

Thank you!

@ , I am trying to print the new versions of the practice tests but am running into the same problem. Please advise. Thank you.

I think this video should be redone because of the way JY discounted AC D. It is descriptively accurate which he says, and it does in fact describe a flaw, which he denies. However, its not the correct AC because the question stem asks which AC most accurately describes the flaw, in which case it isn't AC D, but AC C.

Not too sure this is a great example of a flaw question type we should be practicing as it relies on us making a critical assumption that determines the correct AC. AC C fails to use the word financial in the context of prosperity. This would make us assume that the use of prosperity would have to be in the realm of finance, and by now most of us in the cc have had that JY voice drilled into our heads regarding assumptions. ("Prosperity? What kind of prosperity? Health? Happiness? It could be any type of prosperity. We just don't know.") I'm not one to argue with LSAC test makers as that argument cannot be won, however AC B properly addresses a flaw without relying an assumption that AC C requires the reader to make. Its just a junk question.

If I may add, I also have a question about the new test format: previous formats allowed me to print them on paper, however now it seems I am unable to. Does anyone know how to print the new format? When I click the "printable" tab, it doesn't offer me the usual PDF option with password protection to then print from.

I have discord as well

I'm very interested. Im taking Oct and Nov