i intuitively formed the chain in question 6 using the 'most essential' (matter) for the outcome (knowledge acquisition) so my chain looked like i was breaking down HOW to acquire knowledge in a step-by-step order. the proper chain begins with knowledge acquisition and then goes down each 'sub category' like a pyramid. is this how we should see it? more of a pyramid structure instead of a sequence of events? i'm just a little bit confused but my scapegoat is how i interpret sufficient v. necessity lol help please
0
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
i intuitively formed the chain in question 6 using the 'most essential' (matter) for the outcome (knowledge acquisition) so my chain looked like i was breaking down HOW to acquire knowledge in a step-by-step order. the proper chain begins with knowledge acquisition and then goes down each 'sub category' like a pyramid. is this how we should see it? more of a pyramid structure instead of a sequence of events? i'm just a little bit confused but my scapegoat is how i interpret sufficient v. necessity lol help please