User Avatar
pedrosolynelle178
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
pedrosolynelle178
Monday, Sep 30 2024

This lesson has been the hardest for me with little to no improvement by the end of it... can anyone recommend what to do next? feeling very discouraged.

4
User Avatar

Wednesday, Sep 18 2024

pedrosolynelle178

PT135.S1.Q25- Help

I am having trouble with the lawgic. My take away was:

WD m→ feature art

/comfortable→/WD

comfortable→SI

My thoughts for chaining...

contrapose comfortable→SI to become /SI→/comfortable

Therefore the chain...

/SI→/comfortable→/WD

So if /WD then... /WD m→/feature art

Can someone please explain why this is incorrect?

I appreciate the help!

Admin Note: Edited title. For LR questions, please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."

0
User Avatar
pedrosolynelle178
Wednesday, Sep 18 2024

#Help

I am having trouble with the lawgic. My take away was:

WD ‑m→ feature art

/comfortable→/WD

comfortable→SI

My thoughts for chaining...

contrapose comfortable→SI to become /SI→/comfortable

Therefore the chain...

/SI→/comfortable→/WD

So if /WD then... /WD ‑m→/feature art

Can someone please explain why this is incorrect?

0
User Avatar
pedrosolynelle178
Wednesday, Sep 18 2024

Interested in joining this group for the November round!

0
User Avatar
pedrosolynelle178
Tuesday, Aug 13 2024

#help

I was able to narrow it down between choices A and B, but I was ultimately stuck there. I know he goes on to explain each choices, but I was a bit daunted of making an assumption and I felt like A and B both had some level of assumption. As he was explaining the text, he referred to it as 'suggested/suggestion', which made me all the more confused.

Would appreciate any feedback how to go jump over this hurdle. Thanks!

1
User Avatar
pedrosolynelle178
Sunday, Jul 28 2024

Hi! I am also confused with the 7.5 question, but here is what somewhat understood from the written explanation.

Think back to the sufficient and necessary conditions. "IF" is our conditional indicator which is followed by the sufficient condition.

Sufficient comes before necessary so this means we begin with where IF starts

Original:

Employees in high-revenue departments will receive larger financial rewards than those in support roles if the company's year-end bonuses are determined by sales figures alone.

Apply formula:

IF the company's year-end bonuses are determined by sales figures alone, THEN employees in high-revenue departments will receive larger financial rewards than those in support roles.

Now we have to switch and negate it to produce a contrapositive: and we are left with...

If employees in high-revenue departments do NOT receive larger financial rewards than those in support roles, then the company's year-end bonuses are NOT determined by sales figures alone.

please correct me if this is wrong

2
PrepTests ·
PT127.S3.Q19
User Avatar
pedrosolynelle178
Tuesday, Jul 23 2024

Hi Nick, I was trapped on this question as well. But I identified another differently conclusion which was "your hands are more important for you than possessing the world". I jumped the gun and labeled "it is clear" a conclusion indicator.

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?